Instacart IPO Is an Expensive Lesson for Venture Firms
Source link
CoinNews
Truist Financial (TFC -1.43%) has lost a third of its value in 2023. Almost all of that decline came during the bank runs that pushed a number of regional banks into insolvency early in the year. So far Truist has held up fairly well, all things considered. And yet 1.51% is a number that is still materially affecting the bank’s business.
What does a bank do?
In its simplest form, a bank takes in short-term deposits and then loans out those deposits long term to other people for things like mortgages. It pays interest to depositors for their cash. It charges interest on the loans it makes. Banks like Truist earn the difference between the interest paid and the interest earned. Modern banking is far more complex than this, of course, but this structure is still an important aspect of the industry.
Image source: Getty Images.
In the second quarter Truist paid interest of 1.51% on its deposits on average. That seems like a very small number. For depositors, historically speaking, it is pretty miserly. But it was up from 1.12% in the first quarter. That’s a 39 basis point increase in just three months, or roughly 35%. So while the absolute change doesn’t seem all that material, the percentage change is significant.
Simply put, the more Truist has to pay depositors, the harder it is for the bank to make money. The driving force here has been the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes. And to be fair, Truist doesn’t just have to pay more for deposits, it also gets to charge more for loans. So there’s an offset.
But there’s more to the story here than meets the eye.
Truist is facing a massive change
So that 39 basis point increase happened between the first and second quarters. The interest cost for deposits a year ago was 0.09%. That means that over the past year Truist has had to increase its interest payment to depositors by 142 basis points. That’s nearly 16 times higher! That’s a shocking change in just 12 months.
A good portion of this is related to the ultra-low interest rate environment that existed before the Fed’s rate hikes. Essentially any increase looks large when the starting point is close to zero. But it doesn’t change the impact that the change has had on Truist’s business. The rising cost of deposits is only one of them.
Another important factor to consider is the changes that its customers are making because they now have more attractive options. For example, why bother moving cash between a checking account that earns very little in interest and a CD that also earns very little in interest? But with interest rates rising, customers now have a reason to take action. Non-interest-bearing deposits, which includes things like checking accounts, dropped from $149 billion in the second quarter of 2022 to $124 million in the same part of 2023. That’s a nearly 17% decline. This is basically free money for the bank, and now there’s notably less of it.
But here’s where things get a little more interesting. Interest-bearing deposits rose from $275 billion to $276 billion. That’s a modest increase, but it tells you two things. First, customers are moving money out of non-interest accounts and into interest-bearing accounts now that there is a reason to do so. And competition between banks is heating up for deposits, which suggests that interest costs may not be done rising yet.
Keep an eye on interest costs
To be fair, some of the decline in deposits at Truist is likely related to the bank runs that occurred earlier in the year. So the deposit changes may be exaggerated to some degree. But the interest cost issue is a major headwind. And while Truist isn’t unique in having to deal with it, rising interest costs for deposits will still have a material impact on the bank’s internal operations and its competitive position in the industry. If you own or are looking at Truist, 1.51% is a much bigger number than it may seem at first.
Cocaine is about surpass oil as Colombia’s top export as revenues near $20 billion

-
Cocaine is set to become Colombia’s top export this year, edging out oil products, according to a note from Bloomberg Economics.
-
Revenue derived from Colombia’s cocaine business is nearing $20 billion, ahead of the country’s $19.1 billion in 2022 oil exports.
-
Cocaine production in Colombia is at its highest level since 1991 amid lenient policies from Colombian President Gustavo Petro.
Colombia’s top export is about to shift from oil to cocaine, according to a recent note from Bloomberg Economics.
The shift comes as Colombian President Gustavo Petro keeps a lenient policy towards the coca crop industry in place that dates back to 2013, when the cocaine industry generated just $2.2 billion in export revenues, according to Bloomberg estimates.
Fast forward to 2022, and Colombia’s cocaine industry generated an estimated $18.2 billion in export revenues, just behind oil export revenue of $19.1 billion. With the country’s oil exports dropping 30% in the first half of this year, and its cocaine industry still growing steadily, Bloomberg estimates that 2023 will be the year when Colombia’s cocaine revenues outpace revenues from oil.
Colombia, which is the world’s largest producer of the drug, has seen its cocaine production jump to its highest level since 1991. The country produced 1,738 tons of the drug in 2022, with a total street value of $193 billion.
“From a purely economic standpoint, higher cocaine production and exports have supported short-term activity, domestic demand and external accounts,” Bloomberg economist Felpi Hernandez said.
Instead of attempting to eradicate coca bush farms, as it did in the past, the Colombian government is instead targeting exporters and laboratories that turn the coca leaf into cocaine. That’s led to a surge in crop yields for coca bushes in the past few years, with 230,028 hectares of the plant being cultivated in 2022.
As the country’s drug war shifts from the growers to the producers, the growers are getting more efficient.
“More bushes are reaching their full potential. Producers are also investing in irrigation and fertilizers to boost output and productivity,” Hernandez said. “The average crop yield rose steadily from 4.3 tons of coca leaves per hectare in 2013 to 7.0 in 2020.”
Colombia’s illicit cocaine business represented 5.3% of the country’s GDP last year, Hernandez estimates.

Correction: September 15, 2023 — An earlier version of this story misspelled the name of the country Colombia.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Google grants limited access to its Gemini AI product to select institutions
What is CryptoSlate Alpha?
A web3 membership designed to empower you with cutting-edge insights and knowledge. Learn more ›
Connected to Alpha
Welcome! 👋 You are connected to CryptoSlate Alpha. To manage your wallet connection, click the button below.
Oops…you must lock a minimum of 20,000 ACS
If you don’t have enough, buy ACS on the following exchanges:
Connect via Access Protocol
Access Protocol is a web3 monetization paywall. When users stake ACS, they can access paywalled content. Learn more ›
Disclaimer: By choosing to lock your ACS tokens with CryptoSlate, you accept and recognize that you will be bound by the terms and conditions of your third-party digital wallet provider, as well as any applicable terms and conditions of the Access Foundation. CryptoSlate shall have no responsibility or liability with regard to the provision, access, use, locking, security, integrity, value, or legal status of your ACS Tokens or your digital wallet, including any losses associated with your ACS tokens. It is solely your responsibility to assume the risks associated with locking your ACS tokens with CryptoSlate. For more information, visit our terms page.
Ethereum Surges Ahead Of Bitcoin In Active Addresses, What Does This Mean?
Since its inception, Ethereum has continuously been compared to Bitcoin with the former being hailed as a better option to the latter in some cases. As the years have flown by, the competition has gotten even fiercer, especially with ETH growing rapidly. Eventually, Ethereum seems to be catching up with Bitcoin, especially in terms of active addresses.
Ethereum Active Addresses Surpass Bitcoin
On Thursday, September 14, on-chain data tracker Santiment revealed a surprising update on the fierce rivalry between Bitcoin and Ethereum. In the X post, the tracker revealed that the number of unique addresses that were transaction on the network had reached its second-highest daily figure of all time.
While this is significant on the part of the blockchain alone, it is also significant in terms of the competition between the two largest assets in the space. To put this in perspective, the 1,089,893 figure reported by Santiment puts Ethereum ahead of Bitcoin in terms of this metric alone.
The last time that the daily unique active addresses on the network hit its new all-time high was back in December 2022. So it has been almost a year since the metric was this high, suggesting a unique driving factor behind it.
This report is also in line with the report from Artemis Terminal that shows that Ethereum was right in front of Bitcoin in terms of daily active addresses.

ETH active addresses surpass BTC on Wednesday | Source: Artemis Terminal
Artemis reports that on September 13, Ethereum saw a total of 1.03 million daily addresses compared to Bitcoin’s 743,800 addresses in the same time period. However, this figure has since retracted and Bitcoin has pulled in front of Ethereum once more as of September 14.
What Does This Mean?
While Ethereum’s surge on Wednesday was impressive, it does not mean much since the network has been unable to sustain the growth. Also, the surge could be easily explained by the rise in the popularity of the Friend.Tech decentralized finance social media platform based on the Ethereum blockchain.
Friend.Tech had seemingly come back from the death to reach a new all-time high in its number of daily users. Since an ETH address is required to participate in the platform, it is no surprise there was an uptick in the number of ETH addresses active on the network.
The spike in the number of daily active addresses also seems to have had little impact on the price of the cryptocurrency itself. ETH’s price is still struggling to hold above $1,600, with small gains of 0.35% in the last day and losses of 1.15% in the last week.
ETH price still holding above $1,600 | Source: ETHUSD on Tradingview.com
What is CryptoSlate Alpha?
A web3 membership designed to empower you with cutting-edge insights and knowledge. Learn more ›
Connected to Alpha
Welcome! 👋 You are connected to CryptoSlate Alpha. To manage your wallet connection, click the button below.
Oops…you must lock a minimum of 20,000 ACS
If you don’t have enough, buy ACS on the following exchanges:
Connect via Access Protocol
Access Protocol is a web3 monetization paywall. When users stake ACS, they can access paywalled content. Learn more ›
Disclaimer: By choosing to lock your ACS tokens with CryptoSlate, you accept and recognize that you will be bound by the terms and conditions of your third-party digital wallet provider, as well as any applicable terms and conditions of the Access Foundation. CryptoSlate shall have no responsibility or liability with regard to the provision, access, use, locking, security, integrity, value, or legal status of your ACS Tokens or your digital wallet, including any losses associated with your ACS tokens. It is solely your responsibility to assume the risks associated with locking your ACS tokens with CryptoSlate. For more information, visit our terms page.
Government objects to ‘unnecessary,’ ‘prejudicial’ SBF jury selection questions

On Sept. 15, the United States government responded to questions the defense has suggested posing to potential jurors during their selection for the case against former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. He faces seven charges of fraud and money laundering in connection with the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange that could land him in prison for decades.
The sides submitted their proposed questions to the court on Sept. 11 and showed drastically different standards for selection.
In a letter addressed to Judge Lewis Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams objected to questions in four of the 14 sections of voir dire proposed by the defense. Voir dire is the process of questioning potential jurors. Williams wrote:
“The defendant’s proposed voir dire contains numerous unnecessary and time-consuming questions, often soliciting open-ended discussion, as well as questions that are repetitive, prejudicial, and argumentative.”
Specifically, Williams objects to the questions in sections concerning pretrial publicity, the effective altruism philosophical movement, political donations and lobbying, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Related: Sam Bankman-Fried says, ‘I did what I thought was right,’ in leaked docs: Report
The pretrial publicity section has a shaky legal foundation, while questions about effective altruism “are a thinly veiled attempt to advance a defense narrative.” Questions about political donations are irrelevant and those about ADHD are irrelevant and prejudicial, Williams wrote. Bankman-Fried is said to suffer from ADHD.
SBF’s jury selection delayed by one day to Oct 3. pic.twitter.com/twfb5b69Q9
— Amy Castor (@ahcastor) September 13, 2023
The government’s questions, in contrast, are “standard, neutral, and appropriate,” Williams wrote. Both sides propose asking future jurors about their attitudes toward cryptocurrency. Among the defense questions is:
“If a company involved in the cryptocurrency industry or the financial industry fails, do you feel that only the owners of the company must be to blame?”
Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. His trial will begin in New York on Oct. 3.
Magazine: ‘Ethical’ SBF game axed, Web3 games sign-up process sucks, Tomb Chaser: Web3 Gamer
New game-engine fees ‘unlocking engine for growth’ at Unity, as analyst upgrades stock to a buy
Unity Software Inc. gained an analyst upgrade on Friday on the belief the company’s new game-developer fees will turn its game engine into a growth engine.
On Friday, B. of A. analyst Michael Funk upgraded Unity
U,
to a buy from neutral, and hiked his price target to $56 from $46, because his analysis of the company’s new fee structure “implies improved monetization of the company’s industry leading mobile game creation engine,” which in turn, unlocks Unity’s “engine for growth.”
Unity shares closed up 1.7% at $36.32, for a 3.6% decline on the week, while the broader market sold off with the S&P 500 index
SPX
falling 1.2% Friday, for a weekly loss of 0.2%.
Of the 28 analysts who cover Unity, 19 have buy-grade ratings, seven have hold ratings, and two have sell ratings, along with an average price target of $47.15, according to FactSet data.
On Wednesday, Unity met with blowback after it announced in a Tuesday blog post it would charge more established game developers every time their game was downloaded.
One analyst considered it a “PR disaster,” but saw the upside in the new fees, while shares fell 5.5% Wednesday, and another 3% on Thursday.
Funk said he believes mobile ad spending has stabilized and that “known risks and execution issues are more than priced into the stock.”
Rate hikes cut both ways as corporate bankruptcies head for worst year since 2010, Guggenheim says
Corporate bankruptcies look likely to hit the highest level in 13 years as the Federal Reserve’s interest rate rises exacts a toll, according to Guggenheim Investments.
More than 450 corporations already filed for bankruptcy protection this year through the end of August, eclipsing annual totals for the past two years (see chart). At that pace, Guggenheim’s macroeconomic and research team expects filings this year to reach the highest level since 2010.
Corporate bankruptcies are on pace for worst year since 2010.
Guggenheim Investments, S&P Global Market Intelligence
Guggenheim’s team led by Mike Bush, U.S. economist, said a reacceleration of the U.S. economy looks unlikely, given that key spigots of support for the economy have begun to fade, namely the boost from sharply declining inflation, a growing fiscal deficit and a lack of widespread layoffs.
“The fading of these tailwinds will be a gradual process, but the peak of their support to the economy is now behind us,” the team wrote, in a new client outlook. “With less support from disinflation, fiscal policy, and the labor market, the economy should slow by the end of the year, and we think a recession is likely by early 2024.
Companies often default when their debts comes due and liquidity runs out. Borrowing costs have surged since the Fed began to sharply increase its policy rate to its current 5.25% to 5.5%, a 22-year high.
Like U.S. homeowners, many corporations refinanced at ultra low rates during the pandemic, providing some breathing room from the Fed’s hikes. While the central bank is expected to leave its rate unchanged next week at its September meeting, it is expected to keep rates high for some time.
See: U.S. economy is trending in the Fed’s direction, so expect Powell to tread carefully next week
Cash to the rescue
Higher rates aren’t a one-way street. While corporations face yields of 5.8% and 8.4% to borrow in the corporate bond market, overall interest expenses actually have declined due to gains on cash and cash-like investments, according to Guggenheim.
“We estimate that U.S. nonfinancial corporates are earning a record $171 billion in interest income from cash, Treasury, and Agency debt holdings, up $102 billion in interest earned from the same assets last year,” the team said.
Put another way, while a credit crunch likely helped toppled a struggling bridal chain, Guggenheim expects resilience from “high margin and cash flow industries” as the economy slows, particularly with corporations sitting in the best position to cover interest payments since 1960.
For debt-laden companies the coming months look more precarious. BofA Global said on Friday the U.S. high-yield, or “junk,” bond market faces a Fed that “has no choice” but to keep rates higher for longer, given the central bank’s goal of a 2% annual inflation target.
“We think that the credit market can live with a 3% CPI scenario even at current stretched valuations,” Oleg Melentyev, credit strategist wrote, in a Friday client note. The consumer-price index for August released on Wednesday reflected a 3.7% annual rate, and the biggest jump in 14 months.
Melentyev said a 4% reading of the consumer-price index likely results in cumulative defaults hitting 10%, with “meaningful” downgrades in the high-risk CCC-ratings category. “A re-acceleration to 5% CPI could cause a full-scale default wave,” he said.
Stocks closed lower Friday as the United Auto Workers union kicked off a strike to help compel wage increases by the Big Three automakers. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA
eked out a 0.1% weekly gain, while the S&P 500 index
SPX
shed 0.2% and the Nasdaq Composite Index
COMP
dropped 0.4% since Monday, according to FactSet.
See: UAW strike: Ford, GM, Stellantis record profits haven’t been shared fairly with workers, Biden says
Holesky Testnet Takes Flight On Merge Anniversary Amidst Ethereum 30-Day Slump
One year has passed since the Ethereum (ETH) Merge, which marked the integration of Ethereum’s proof-of-stake (PoS) Beacon Chain with the Ethereum Mainnet.
This significant milestone facilitated the transition of the Ethereum blockchain from the legacy proof-of-work (PoW) system to a PoS model, giving rise to Ethereum 2.0.
The completion of the Merge on September 15, 2022, brought about a major shift in Ethereum’s energy consumption, with an expected reduction of 99.95%. Additionally, this transition opened up new possibilities for scaling the Ethereum ecosystem.
The merge involved migrating the entire blockchain to new PoS validator nodes, which require participants to stake or lock up 32 Ether (ETH) to participate in the network.
Importantly, this transition did not impact Ether tokens held by investors, and the operations of Ethereum-based applications remained unchanged. As Ethereum celebrated the first anniversary of The Merge, it introduced its latest testnet called Holesky.
The Future Of Ethereum Development And Testing?
Initially known as Holli, the Holesky testnet is designed to enhance the testing environment on Ethereum. Drawing inspiration from a vibrant neighborhood in Prague, Czech Republic, this new testnet offers various improvements over its predecessor, Goerli.
According to a blog post from the software development firm Tatum, Holesky is set to replace Goerli as the primary testnet for staking, infrastructure, and protocol development. For testing decentralized applications, smart contracts, and other Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-related functions, the Sepolia testnet remains the preferred choice.
Holesky, on the other hand, serves as Ethereum’s merged-from-genesis public testnet, mirroring mainnet functionalities and enabling precise evaluations through thorough staking trials, infrastructure assessments, and direct protocol developer testing. To ensure rigorous testing, Holesky aims to have twice as many active validators as the main Ethereum network.
The network starts with a solid foundation of 1 million validators, encouraging teams to run a substantial number of validators, with each team handling around 100,000 validators. These measures contribute to the comprehensive evaluation of the testnet and intended functionality.
According to Tatum’s blog post, by introducing Holesky and refining inflation mechanisms based on the Sepolia testnet, Ethereum continues to evolve and improve its protocols.
One Year After The Merge
In a recent post on X (Formerly Twitter), the self-proclaimed Ethereum Educator, who goes by the pseudonym “Sassal.eth,” highlighted some notable statistics on the first anniversary of The Merge.
One significant achievement for Ethereum since the Merge is burning 980,000 ETH tokens, resulting in a permanent reduction of Ethereum’s total supply. Burning ETH involves removing tokens from circulation, contributing to potential scarcity and value.
Additionally, the Ethereum 2.0 network has seen a significant 11.6 million ETH being staked, which involves locking up ETH as collateral to participate in the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism.
Moreover, according to Sassal, adding 362,000 new validators has strengthened the Ethereum network. Validators are crucial in proposing and validating new blocks, ensuring the network’s security and overall robustness.
On the other hand, Ethereum’s native token, ETH, has experienced a tumultuous journey in terms of its price performance since the beginning of the year. Despite reaching an annual high of $2,144 on April 16, ETH has been impacted by the overall market trend, resulting in significant losses across various time frames.
Currently, ETH is trading at $1,619, representing a 1% decline in the past 24 hours. Similarly, over the past seven days, the token has recorded a decrease of 0.9%.
Looking at the fourteen and 30-day time frames, ETH has experienced declines of 1% and 11.3%, respectively, underscoring the prevailing downward trend for the token’s value.
However, it is worth noting that since the occurrence of The Merge, ETH has witnessed a moderate rise of 7.6% year to date, according to Coingecko data.
Featured image from iStock, chart from TradingView.com
