
Some exchange-traded funds rallied Wednesday even as stocks and bonds broadly fell, as hot inflation data stoked fears that interest rates will stay elevated for longer than anticipated.
Source link
Finance
Costco is selling lots of gold; should you be buying? How this gold rush impacts the market
Costco’s decision to sell precious metals has brought it golden buzz.
A Wells Fargo report stated that the bank’s analysts believe that the warehouse retail giant is selling between $100 million to $200 million in gold per month.
Wells Fargo suggested that the precious metal offering was a way to add value to the company’s brand noting that “it’s a very low-profit business at best.”
“We view the addition of gold/silver as a smart move for Costco, as it only reinforces its value position,” the report said.
The buzz around Costco’s offering has led to increased interest in investing in the metal, according to Zachary Scott, general manager of Wilshire Coin in Santa Monica, Calif. Scott said that he is seeing customers who are “less than typical” brought in after seeing gold being sold by “a trusted company.”
“It’s bringing in new buyers and interest, though not in massive amounts, who have seen the articles around Costco selling gold,” Scott said.
How much gold is Costco selling?
Using the estimates from the Wells Fargo report and an approximate price of $2,000 Costco sells between 50,000 and 100,000 ounces of gold per month.
USA TODAY reached out to Costco to inquire about the volume of gold it has sold and did not receive a response.
Gold prices since Costco started selling
After Costco introduced the 1 oz. gold bars to its website last October the spot price of the metal held steady around $2,000 until an upswing that started in February.
The metal made a run at the start of March that stabilized around the $2,175 mark in the middle of the month. Gold is experiencing another breakout that started at the end of March and has continued.
The spot price of the metal was $2,341.35 as of 9 a.m. ET Thursday, April 11.
Should someone buy gold?

Whether it’s a good time to buy gold depends on various factors, including your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon, the broader economic outlook, and forecasts about the gold market.
Historically, many people view gold as a hedge against inflation and currency fluctuations. Others see it as a store of value during economic downturns. At the same time, some may find diversifying a portfolio of stocks and bonds useful, given its low correlation to both assets.
“If you look at gold’s performance historically, it’s the kind of asset that should perform well through uncertainty, as it has done in five out of the last seven recessions,” said Joseph Cavatoni, chief market strategist for North America at the World Gold Council. “For people looking for a store of value and a portfolio diversifier, gold has a strong track record of delivering those qualities.”
Contributing: Tony Dong and Farran Powel USA TODAY Blueprint
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Costco gold sales increase interest in metal but doesn’t move market
STZ earnings call for the period ending March 31, 2024.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Constellation Brands (STZ 1.29%)
Q4 2024 Earnings Call
Apr 11, 2024, 10:30 a.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good day, and welcome to the Constellation Brands fiscal-year 2024 fourth quarter full-year earnings call. [Operator instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Snehal Shah, director of investor relations. Mr.
Shah, you may now begin.
Snehal Shah — Director, Investor Relations
Thank you, Rob. Good morning, all, and welcome to Constellation Brands’ year-end fiscal 2024 earnings conference call. I’m here this morning with Bill Newlands, our CEO; and Garth Hankinson, our CFO. As a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measures and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in today’s news release or otherwise available on the company’s website at www.cbrands.com.
Please note, when we discuss comparable earnings per share figures for fiscal 2024 and prior fiscal years, we are referring to earnings per share on a comparable basis, excluding Canopy equity and earnings, unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the news release and Constellation’s SEC filings for risk factors which may impact forward-looking statements made on this call. Following the call, we will also be making available in the Investors section of our company’s website a series of slides with key highlights of the prepared remarks shared by Bill and Garth in today’s call. Before turning the call over to Bill, in line with prior quarters, I would like to ask that we limit everyone to one question per person, which will help us to end our call on time today.
Thanks in advance, and now here’s Bill.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Snehal, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our fiscal ’24 year-end earnings call. As usual, I’d like to start with a few headlines from this past fiscal year. First, I’m pleased to report that we delivered another year of strong performance in fiscal ’24.
We drove comparable earnings-per-share growth of nearly 9% and remain focused on achieving our stated medium-term target of low double-digit comparable EPS growth moving forward. This growth was supported by a net sales increase of 5% at an enterprise level and solid operating leverage that resulted in an increase of 7% in comparable operating income, representing an enterprise-comparable operating margin of nearly 33%. This performance once again yielded recognition for Constellation Brands as the No. 1 growth leader among large CPG companies by Circana in calendar year ’23 as we have been five of the last seven years.
We are the only CPG company of scale to make their top 10 ranking for 11 consecutive years. Our continued strong performance and momentum heading into fiscal ’25 reinforces our confidence in our ability to deliver against the following targets outlined at our investor day this past November, maintaining 6% to 8% enterprise net sales growth, delivering 33% to 35% enterprise comparable operating income margin and generating low double-digit comparable earnings-per-share growth, all of which we intend to achieve in fiscal ’25. Second, from a segment perspective, our fiscal ’24 results were largely driven by our beer business, which delivered net sales and operating income growth above 9% and 8%, respectively, both exceeding our expectations from the beginning of the year. This strong performance drove our largest dollar share gain ever for a full fiscal year, adding an impressive 2 points of dollar share within the U.S.
beer category. And we achieved a significant milestone this year as Modelo Especial became the No. 1 beer in U.S. dollar sales.
Furthermore, across all beverage alcohol, our beer business was the No. 1 dollar share gainer, capturing 1.1 points of share and driving nearly 70% of the total dollar growth in the sector. This was truly a remarkable achievement by our entire beer team working in concert with our distributor and retail partners as they delivered volume growth for the 14th consecutive year which is certainly another incredible differentiator among CPG companies. In our wine and spirits business, we faced a series of near-term category headwinds throughout fiscal ’24 but remain confident that our strategy is sound.
We recently promoted Sam Glaetzer to serve as our new president of wine and spirits. He is a well-rounded and accomplished industry veteran with nearly 30 years of experience in the wine and spirits category and a successful track record of driving commercial and operational efficiency and effectiveness. Sam also played an integral role in the implementation of the business transformation over the last few years, leading our global end-to-end supply chain optimization initiatives and building a world-class farming, winemaking, and distilling network, aligned to consumer preferences while developing a focused international route to market to deliver incremental growth for the business in the medium term. Now with the strategic transformation of our wine and spirits portfolio is largely complete, Sam is well-positioned to lead our team in driving enhanced focus on execution, and the delivery of growth and improved profitability.
To that end, our wine and spirits team has identified several immediate actions to help drive improvement in our year-over-year top-line performance, which I’ll discuss in more detail shortly. Third, we continue to achieve superior cash flow generation and deployed that cash in a disciplined and balanced manner underpinned by our consistent capital allocation priorities. For fiscal ’24, we generated $2.8 billion in operating cash flow, and we’re able to reduce our net leverage ratio by nearly 0.5 point while returning over $900 million back to our shareholders through quarterly dividends and share repurchases. We also continue to prudently invest to support the ongoing growth with total capital expenditures of nearly $1.3 billion in fiscal ’24, most of which was focused on capacity additions to our beer brewing operations.
And fourth, we continued to deliver against our environmental, social, and governance objectives, which I’ll discuss in more detail shortly. With that as a backdrop, let’s turn to a more detailed discussion of our fiscal ’24 performance, starting with our beer business, which despite some challenging weather in our fourth quarter, grew depletions by 9%, resulting in our 56th consecutive quarter of depletions growth. For the full year, we continue to extend our lead as the No. 1 high-end beer supplier in the U.S., delivering top share gains across the total beer category underpinned by a nearly 14% increase in dollar sales and nearly 11% volume growth across tracked channels.
And in line with our expectations, we captured low double-digit percent incremental shelf space this spring while adding another 21,000 resets through our shopper-first shelf program in fiscal ’24. These factors all played a significant role in driving the growth of our beer business paired with the strength of our portfolio’s iconic brands starting with Modelo Especial, which grew depletions by nearly 10% and maintained its leading position as the top share gainer, and as noted earlier, the No. 1 overall beer brand in U.S. tracked channels.
Corona Extra increased depletions nearly 1% and maintained its position as the No. 3 high-end beer brand in the U.S. and Pacifico delivered depletion growth over 17% as it reached the 20 million case sold milestone and remained a top 10 share gainer across the total beer category and the No. 4 share gainer in the high end.
While we continue to build on the success of our iconic brands, we are also building good traction with our focused innovations aligned with consumer-led trends of premiumization, flavor, and betterment. Our Modelo Chelada brands delivered an increase of 30% in depletions also surpassing 20 million cases sold and remained the No. 1 Chelada in the category supported by the launch of our new flavor, Sandía Picante, and new pack size offerings. We are excited to continue to build on that momentum in fiscal ’25 with two new flavors, Fresa Picante and Negra con Chile.
Modelo Oro’s national launch established a strong foundation for the brand as it rose to become a top five share gainer across the total beer category and the No. 3 share gainer in the high end with just two SKUs. Given that strong reception and ongoing consumer demand for betterment products, we are launching two more Modelo Oro SKUs in fiscal ’25, an 18 pack and a 24 pack. Staying within the Modelo brand family, our new Aguas Frescas variety pack secured the No.
1 new FMB spot in its test market of Nevada. So on fiscal ’25, we will be expanding its rollout to another 20 markets for this authentic liquid aligned with consumer-led flavor trends and featuring our project, our nitro technology. In our Corona brand family, we introduced Corona nonalcoholic, which is the leading dollar share gainer in the fast-growing nonalcoholic beer segment. As for fiscal ’25, we are testing Corona Sunbrew in select Eastern markets.
This new refreshing beer is brewed with real citrus peels and a splash of real citrus juice. The strong execution of our beer business in fiscal ’24 was also reflected in our ability to maintain best-in-class margins by combating trailing inflation headwinds with cost savings and efficiency initiatives. We also continued to invest in our beer business in fiscal ’24, deploying approximately $950 million in capital expenditures, supporting our ability to meet the continued robust demand we see for our brands through the expansion of our beer brewing capacity at Nava and Obregon and the ongoing work at our new Veracruz site. Looking ahead to fiscal ’25 and in line with the plan we laid out at our investor day in November, we expect our beer business to remain within our net sales growth algorithm of 7% to 9% and for operating margins to gradually improve, supported by our operating income growth of 10% to 12%.
Moving on to wine and spirits. Due largely to the challenging market dynamics referenced earlier, our wine and spirits business saw declines of approximately 8% for both organic net sales and operating income but still landed within our revised guidance range. While we do not expect ongoing challenges in the wine and spirits category to immediately subside, particularly in the mainstream and premium price segments, we have identified several areas to improve the performance of our wine and spirits business in fiscal ’25, including, but not limited to, refocusing our efforts within our premium and above brands to more consistently drive growth in our most scaled and central offerings, notably in Crawford, Meiomi, The Prisoner, High West, and Mi Campo while accelerating additional tactical investments to revitalize the equity and support demand for our largest mainstream brand, Woodbridge, and ensuring that we continue to support the transformation of other significant brands in our portfolio, such as SVEDKA, Vint by Robert Mondavi, Ruffino, and Lumina. Note that these 11 brands represent three-quarters of net sales and over 80% of volumes for our wine and spirits business in fiscal ’24, which is why we plan to provide more focus and investment for them.
Another key area we are focused on is aligning with our U.S. wholesale distributor partners on clear priorities to help enhance our performance in our largest markets and channels. As noted in our prior call, these priorities include enhanced focus on improving mix, inventory, and sales execution. We will also be making additional investments in media spend and price promotions, as well as adjustments in our own sales capabilities, to better support the execution and go-to-market efforts of our distributor partners.
And similar to our beer business, we will continue to focus more broadly on efficiency opportunities to drive operational and sales excellence across our wine and spirits segment. This will include the operational and supply chain initiatives highlighted at our investor day, as well as enhancements to the business’s organizational structure to enable a more effective and competitive operating model. Looking forward to fiscal ’25, we expect our wine and spirits business net sales to be relatively stable and operating income to be down 9% to 11%. While we believe the focus on sales execution I just outlined will help stabilize the top-line growth for wine and spirits, our operating income guidance reflects incremental investments in additional media spend price promotions and sales capabilities, as well as continued inflationary pressures on some cost of goods sold and lapping of distributor contractual payments and reduced incentive compensation that occurred in fiscal ’24.
As we noted, we remain committed to continuing to advance this business over the coming years toward the medium-term targets shared at our investor day. Moving on to capital allocation. we continue to deliver against our stated priorities and targets in fiscal ’24. As noted earlier, we further strengthened our balance sheet with a reduction in our net leverage ratio, supported by our strong earnings performance and our disciplined debt management.
We returned cash to shareholders and deployed most of our capital investments to brewery expansions to support the growth of our beer business, and we continue to conduct tuck-in gap-filling acquisitions that are aligned with consumer-led trends and complemented our portfolio. We also made notable progress in regards to our environmental, social, and governance ambitions in fiscal ’24. From a governance perspective, our board undertook refreshment actions that resulted in the appointment of two new independent directors, each with strong financial backgrounds. We also recently announced the election of a new independent board chair, Chris Baldwin, who brings a wealth of senior leadership experience from the CPG sector.
In addition, in line with our commitment to be good stewards of the environment, since we had surpassed our initial water restoration target in fiscal ’23, we established a new goal of restoring more than 5 billion gallons of water to key water sheds near our operations between the time frame covering fiscal ’23 and ’25. This goal is designed to ensure local residents and businesses have ample supply and access to water, which is the key to building sustainable and thriving communities. Finally, we announced two new environmental commitments in fiscal ’24 to reduce waste within our key operating facilities and to enhance circular packaging. So in summary, we once again achieved another strong year of performance and significant progress across our strategic initiatives in fiscal ’24, and we fully expect to build on this momentum in fiscal ’25.
We are confident in our ability to continue to create shareholder value and deliver on our commitments, including achieving low double-digit comparable EPS growth by generating high single-digit net sales growth and delivering best-in-class margins for our beer business, managing category challenges and improving the growth trajectory of our wine and spirits business with enhanced execution and maintaining our capital allocation discipline and commitment to operate in a way that is good for business and good for the world. As I wrap up, I want to once again thank all of our colleagues across Constellation, as well as our trade partners, for their hard work and dedication in helping us deliver another year of industry-leading performance, and I believe we are well-positioned to keep that momentum going in fiscal ’25. And with that, I will turn the call over to Garth, who will give more details on our financial results and outlook.
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Bill, and good morning, everyone. As usual, my discussion will focus mainly on our comparable P&L results, starting at an enterprise level followed by business segment detail for fiscal ’24. I will then discuss our fiscal ’25 outlook and expectations in the same matter. Starting with net sales.
As an enterprise, we delivered growth of over 5% slightly exceeding our fiscal ’24 guidance range of 4% to 5%. This was driven by the strong performance of our beer business, which grew net sales over 9%, exceeding our guidance of 8% to 9%. As Bill mentioned, our beer business had another strong year of depletion growth, a 7.5% increase as the strength of our portfolio carried throughout the entire year. Off-premise depletions grew by over 8%, which represent nearly 89% of our total depletion volume.
The on-premise accounts for the balance of our depletions and grew by over 1%. We expect to build on our momentum in off-premise channels, supported by the low double-digit incremental shelf space that we captured this spring, which we foreshadowed at our investor day last November. And we continue to see opportunity to drive growth in the on-premise with new draft handles particularly from Modelo Especial and Pacifico in the coming fiscal year. I will elaborate on fiscal ’25 shortly.
Shipment volumes for our beer business in fiscal ’24 grew 7.4%, and we achieved favorable pricing of 2%. These volume and pricing increases were partially offset by the divestiture of our craft beer business and an unfavorable shift in product mix. In aggregate, the volume, price and mix changes amounted to a nearly $700 million increase in beer net sales for fiscal ’24. In regards to selling days, we had one extra sell day in the year, which occurred in Q4.
This had a minimal impact on our volumes as shipments and depletions on an absolute basis were over 99% aligned for the year. For our wine and spirits business, net sales declined 9% and 8% on a reported and organic basis, respectively. The change in organic net sales for our wine and spirits business was within our lowered guidance range of a 7% to 9% decline. This decline was largely driven by unfavorable U.S.
wholesale performance, particularly across our mainstream and premium brands. As Bill noted, we are working with our U.S. wholesale distributor partners to enhance performance in our largest markets and channels in fiscal ’25. Additionally, in our international markets, net sales for fiscal ’24 were down 7% by destocking, particularly in Canada, our largest export market.
More recently, in Q4, net sales from our international markets grew 14%, largely driven by the Canadian market where inventory levels have begun to normalize. The net sales decline in our U.S. wholesale and international markets were partially offset by 10% net sales growth in our direct-to-consumer channel. Moving on to our operating income and margin.
At an enterprisewide level, we delivered a 7% increase in comparable operating income at the upper end of our 6% to 7% guidance resulting in a 50-basis-point increase in comparable operating margin to 32.6%. This was driven by the strong performance of our beer business, which grew operating income by just over 8% and delivered an operating margin of 37.9%. Enterprisewide operating margins also benefited from an 11% reduction or $30 million decrease in corporate expense driven mainly by reduced third-party consulting fees related to our DBA project spend. This solid performance was partially offset by our wine and spirits results, as operating income, excluding the gross profit, less marketing of the brands that are no longer part of the business following their divestiture, declined by 8%.
This decline was within our lowered guidance range of a 6% to 8% decline, resulting in a flat year-over-year operating margin of 22.2%. Elaborating on the margin puts and takes in more detail, starting with the beer business. The increase in operating income and slight 40-basis-point decrease in operating margin were reflective of an absolute increase of approximately 12% in overall COGS. This increase in COGS includes the impact of increased volume and the nearly $205 million from cost savings initiatives realized in fiscal ’24.
By COGS component and on an absolute basis, inclusive of both volume growth and cost savings, year-over-year changes were as follows: Raw materials and packaging represented the midpoint of 55% to 60% of total COGS and had an absolute increase of 16%; Logistics, making up just over 20% of total COGS, increased 3% as a large portion of the benefits from our cost savings agenda came from this area; Labor and overhead landed at just under 15% of total COGS and increased 19% attributable to the construction activities at our Veracruz brewery; and the remaining portion of total COGS depreciation increased approximately $37 million, representing the incremental capacity that was brought online in fiscal ’24. Moving on to marketing. Our dollar spend increased by approximately 2% year over year. As a percent of fiscal ’24 net sales, marketing was approximately 8.5%, coming in slightly below our medium-term 9% algorithm, partly driven by the divestiture of our craft beer brands and efficiencies from the transition to our new media agency.
Lastly, SG&A, which represented approximately 5% of net sales increased approximately 8%, driven by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency and increased compensation and benefits. These increases were partially offset by benefits from the craft beer divestiture and lower legal fees. Moving on. Our wine and spirits business operating income margin, excluding the gross profit, less marketing of the brands that are no longer part of the business following last year’s divestiture remained flat year over year as the volume decline and unfavorable channel mix were offset by favorability in our COGS, driven by nearly $40 million coming from our cost savings initiatives, favorable pricing, reduced other SG&A expenses and a reduction in marketing expense.
Interest expense for fiscal ’24 was about $435 million, a 9% increase from prior year, driven by higher average borrowings and weighted average interest rates. We ended fiscal ’24 with our comparable net leverage ratio, excluding Canopy equity and earnings of 3.2 times, leaving us well-positioned to achieve our target of approximately three times in fiscal ’25. Our comparable effective tax rate, excluding Canopy equity and earnings, was 18.5% versus 19.2% last year. Comparable EPS for fiscal ’24, excluding Canopy equity and earnings, grew nearly 9% year over year to $12.38 and came in above our guidance range of $12 to $12.20.
Moving to fiscal ’24 free cash flow, which we define as net cash provided by operating activities less capex. We generated free cash flow slightly over $1.5 billion, exceeding our $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion guidance range. Free cash flow decreased 12% year over year, driven by a 23% increase in capex investments attributable to our expansions at our existing facilities and the ongoing construction of our new brewery in Veracruz. In fiscal ’24, we increased our total nominal capacity from our Mexico brewery operations from 42 million hectoliters to approximately 48 million hectoliters as a result of the modular expansions brought online over the summer that were fully ramped by year end, along with unlocked incremental capacity through our optimization initiatives.
Consistent with our capital allocation priorities, we once again delivered cash returns to our shareholders with over $900 million of expenditures in dividends and share repurchases. In addition, we executed portfolio gap filling transactions, encompassing both a tuck-in acquisition of a female and Black-founded luxury wine brand with a successful track record and a venture investment in the high-growth nonalcoholic space in fiscal ’24. With that, let me now step through our outlook for fiscal ’25, starting with net sales. We are targeting our enterprisewide net sales to grow 6% to 7%, inclusive of a 7% to 9% growth target for our beer business and a 0.5% decline to 0.5% growth in net sales for our wine and spirits business.
The beer top-line outlook is expected to be primarily achieved by continued strong volume growth of our portfolio. Again, we expect this to come from distribution of our largest brands bolstered by spring shelf reset gains, the health and continued support of our consumers and innovation in the form of brand extensions, new-to-world products, and new pack sizes. Regarding beer volumes. We anticipate fiscal ’25 shipments and depletions to track closely on an absolute basis, consistent with prior years.
Similarly, we expect the cadence of our shipments and depletions in terms of share of annual volumes from a quarter and a half year perspective to be fairly in line with fiscal ’24. For wine and spirits net sales, we expect to largely offset ongoing category headwinds as we drive the sales and marketing execution initiatives described by Bill earlier. Additionally, we expect mix-related benefits due to the better performance in our higher-end brands. That said, we continue to anticipate overall volume growth to remain challenged, particularly due to demand headwinds in the mainstream and premium price segments, which account for a major part of our volumes.
Furthermore, from a net sales perspective, we are expecting unfavorable lapping of bulk sales through fiscal ’24. From a cadence perspective, we also expect quarterly and half-yearly shipments and depletion shares of the full-year total to be fairly aligned with fiscal ’24. For fiscal ’25 operating income, we expect comparable enterprisewide growth between 8% and 10%, reflecting 10% to 12% operating income growth for our beer business, a 9% to 11% operating income decline for our wine and spirits business and a slight increase in corporate expense to approximately $260 million. For our beer business, we anticipate operating income tailwinds from volume growth and favorable pricing.
We expect these tailwinds will be partially offset by continued input cost inflation with an absolute increase in COGS, inclusive of volume growth, cost savings initiatives and our multiyear hedging actions in the high single digits. We expect the following percent of total COGS and absolute increases across each component. For packaging and raw materials to account for 55% to 60% and increase mid- to high single digits. Logistics to make up approximately 20% and increased mid-single digits.
Labor and overhead to be approximately 15%, an increase in the high teens primarily driven by merit salary increases given the strong operational performance from the business and incremental headcount, primarily at our Veracruz brewery as we continue with construction. And the remainder of COGS depreciation with a mid-single-digit increase, which approximately equates to a $20 million step-up which is slightly lower than recent years given prior depreciation of the packaging line of the ABA facility that was operational throughout all of fiscal ’24. Outside of COGS, we expect marketing expense as a percent of net sales to be approximately 8.5%, which is lower than our unchanged medium-term algorithm of 9%. The change of marketing expense as a percent of net sales for fiscal ’25 is driven by a shift in our marketing investment allocation with an overall focus on maximizing value.
The investment shift is geared toward prioritizing our largest brands to support their continued momentum followed by our high-growth potential next wave brands and then thoughtful and deliberate investments to support our innovation pipeline. And savings driven by efficiencies from our new media agency partnership announced in Q3 of fiscal ’24. Rounding out beer operating margin drivers, we anticipate SG&A as a percent of net sales to be approximately 5%, in line with the medium-term algorithm we provided during our investor day. All in, this implies beer operating margins of approximately 39% as our beer business continues to generate best-in-class operating margins and year-over-year improvement as we close in on our medium-term targets.
For our wine and spirits business, operating income, we anticipate an overall COGS increase of mid- to high single digits, driven by less favorable fixed cost absorption as a result of lower volumes and higher seller overhead and blend costs partially offset by favorability in logistics and packaging costs as part of our cost savings initiatives. For marketing and other SG&A expense as a percent of net sales, we anticipate 9% and 10%, respectively, each slightly above our medium-term outlook, driven by the adjustments to our marketing, pricing, and sales investments to drive top-line growth and partially offset by organizational structure changes, both points previously referenced by Bill. In addition, we expect to face headwinds from unfavorable lapping of contractual distributor payments and lower compensation and benefits in FY ’24. That said, this implies wine and spirits operating margins to contract to approximately 20% in fiscal ’25 as we continue to navigate category headwinds and reset investment in certain marketing and sales activities.
We believe our enhanced focus on execution and planned cost savings can provide margin improvement over the medium term toward the targets outlined at our investor day in November. Corporate expense is anticipated to increase slightly as we continue to invest in the business while reducing third-party fees more broadly. We expect interest expense to be approximately $445 million to $455 million, driven by higher weighted average interest rates, and we expect our comparable effective tax rate to remain unchanged coming in at approximately 18.5%. We expect noncontrolling interest to be about $35 million and anticipated weighted average diluted shares outstanding for fiscal ’25 to be around 183 million, inclusive of share repurchase activity.
Based on these assumptions, we expect our reported EPS to be between $13.40 and $13.70 and our comparable EPS to be between $13.50 and $13.80, representing a 10% midpoint increase year over year. From a cash flow perspective, we expect our free cash flow in fiscal ’25 to be between $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion, reflective of $2.8 billion to $3 billion of operating cash flow net of capex spend of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion, driven primarily by the expansions of our existing breweries and the ongoing construction in Veracruz. We anticipate approximately $3 billion of remaining capex spend from fiscal ’25 to fiscal ’28 with fiscal ’25 expected to be the peak spend year as we progress with the construction of our greenfield site in Veracruz. Consistent with our investor day messaging, we expect a step-up in free cash flow that should yield cumulatively between $7 billion to $9 billion from fiscal ’26 to fiscal ’28.
To conclude, we ended fiscal ’24 with strong results driven by continued outstanding growth in our beer business as its core brands reached new milestones in cases sold and market share. Our wine and spirits business faced difficult market conditions in FY ’24, but we’ve identified key actions to improve execution and performance. As we look ahead to fiscal ’25, we are confident that we can deliver against our plan with strong enterprise results aligned with our medium-term targets, execute our capital allocation priorities, and seek to create value for our shareholders. We thank you for your ongoing support throughout fiscal ’24 and look forward to updating you on our progress and success in fiscal ’25.
With that, Bill and I are happy to answer your questions.
Questions & Answers:
Operator
Thank you. [Operator instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question. So we lost that questioner.Moving on to our next questioner is coming from Nik Modi with RBC Capital Markets.
Please proceed with your question.
Nik Modi — RBC Capital Markets — Analyst
Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Just two quick ones for me. Just been getting a lot of questions about gross margin and wanted to get any perspective on if there’s any one-time issues that might have affected the gross margin this quarter for beer.
And then the second part of that is just — when you think about the shipments this quarter, can you give us any context on how much might have been attributable to some — whether it be the Aguas Frescas launch into wholesale or preparing for some of the shelf easements, that would be helpful. Thank you.
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Nik. I’ll try to address both of those. First, on the gross margins. As we laid out in our press release, we did have a bit of a write-off of a bad accrual as it relates to bad receivables in Q4.
That impacted our Q4 operating margin by about 100 basis points. Obviously, that would have hit gross margin as well, and that impacted the full year by about 30 basis points, again, at the operating profit margin — as it relates to Q4 impact of Aguas Frescas launch, very, very minimal impact, really just the strength of the portfolio more broadly is what drove Q4.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is come from the line of Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.
Dara Mohsenian — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Hey, guys. Can you hear me?
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Second time’s a charm, Dara.
Dara Mohsenian — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
OK, great. So I wanted to touch on beer depletions, the near 7% result in the quarter ex the extra day is a pretty solid result considering the weather. Can you just give us any sense for momentum so far in March and April when the weather normalized or maybe how big a drag January was in Q4? Just give us sort of a sense of underlying trends. And just on market share, you mentioned the shelf space gains being disproportionate this year post-Bud Light struggles.
How much of a positive impact are you expecting from that? And can you juxtapose that versus the risk that Bud Light trends get better and you see some direct impact on your brands from that? Thanks.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Sure. We obviously take into account our March results with our overall expectations for the year. But I’d say March was very consistent with what our expectations were. Everyone sjSKU in dollar return.
And it certainly is reflective of what I’m sure all retailers are seeing and that our brands are driving the growth in the category.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bryan Spillane with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.
Bryan Spillane — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst
Good morning. So I guess just stepping back, we had this question a couple of times this morning and maybe the underlying question is just, at an enterprise level, we get back to being basically on algorithm for the year, but in a year where wine and spirits underdelivers beer — at least in terms of growth rate on operating profit, maybe a little faster than normal, a little help from below the line on interest expense. So just is it a coincidence, right, that basically, there can be a hole with wine and spirits under delivering but there were other offsets. Or was this more a function of you all maybe making some adjustments to get to that place, whether it’s pulling some savings forward or using some tax credits.
So I think people are just trying to understand how much manipulation or how much work you had to do to sort of make up the difference or whether this was just a coincidence.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
No, Bryan. We don’t play with the numbers. The numbers reflected very strong results in our beer business. As we’ve said, we’ve had some challenges in our wine and spirits business.
As you know, we just installed a new president of our wine and spirits business whose focus will be on execution. We have a number of things in this coming year that will cause it to be a bit of a reset year at the bottom line because we’re lapping a number of one-time issues, but that isn’t going to stop us from delivering on the enterprisewide results that we committed to in New York and that we are reiterating today. We expect to continue to show best-in-class results. As you heard in my remarks, last year, we again were the No.
1 growth company in Circana large companies as we have been five of the last seven years, and that is what’s really driving the success of our business, not anything else.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Lauren Lieberman with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.
Lauren Lieberman — Barclays — Analyst
Great. Thanks. Good morning. I was just curious, you gave a lot of help and color on the wine and spirits.
But I was just curious, we’ve heard in the industry more about — you spoke last quarter about promotional pressures. Other manufacturers have talked about retailer destocking, seeing more inventory management at the distributor level. Just curious to hear your take on kind of the promotional environment and kind of state of the union on inventory levels within the system, knowing it’s tough to have visibility within 3 tier but just curious your view on inventory in the system online.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Yes, you bet. We did see some inventory reduction this past fiscal year, particularly in Canada. There was quite a bit of inventory realignment in Canada. And certainly, there has been some that we’ve seen in the U.S.
as well. The thing that I think is important for us to continue to focus on is we’ve made a number of changes. We’re going to focus on those 11 brands that are really the biggest drivers of our success. That’s a bit of a change.
Frankly, we’d probably peanut buttered our efforts a little too broadly in the past, and we’re going to focus on those brands that we believe have real growth potential for the long term. We’re also going to do a bit more promotional spend than we have in the past, particularly on brands like Woodbridge, where that’s an important part of the consumer dynamic. A lot of work and research has been done in the last few months to make sure that we understand all of the consumer dynamics around our critical brands, and we will execute against those dynamics in this coming year. And I think that’s reflective of an improved pipeline that you see this year, acknowledging there’ll be a bit of a reset at the bottom line.
Operator
Next question is from the line of Chris Carey with Wells Fargo Securities. Please proceed with your question
Chris Carey — Wells Fargo Securities — Analyst
Hi. Good morning, everyone. So Garth, thank you for all the perspective on expectations around your margins for the full year. Can you just perhaps expand a little bit on what specifically is driving the commodity input inflation, number one? And then secondly, if I put all this together, it does feel like maybe there’s a little bit of top-line leverage you’re expecting or you need a little bit more savings on the G&A line to get to the low double-digit number for the full year in the division.
So maybe just help provide any context on that. So thanks on the commodities and maybe just some of the assumptions on how you’re getting to the operating profit number for the full year. Thanks so much.
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. So just as it relates to margins for beer, I think that — first of all, I think we have to acknowledge that if you look at the past two years and you look at the disruption we saw to global supply chains and then the elevated inflation environment that we’ve been dealing with that the improved margins starting in the back half of our fiscal ’24 and then moving forward with significant margin expansion in FY ’25 to get near the low end of our target range, I think that that’s no small feat. As we look forward to FY ’25, we’re going to face similar tailwinds and headwinds that we have for the last several years. The tailwinds, again, will be volumetric growth given the strength of our brands, as well as the — our typical pricing algorithm.
Some of the issues that we’ll face or headwinds that we’ll face is that while commodity prices have certainly abated from their highs, they’re certainly sort of higher still than their historical norms or near-term historical norms. And there have been a couple of commodities that have been a bit resilient in their strength, if you will, or haven’t come down nearly as much as we would have hoped. So we still face those. In addition, we have the strength of the peso, which is something that we’re going to continue to manage through.
Fortunately, we’re hedged as we enter the year against the peso at about 80%. So we’re going to manage that effectively. And as you’ve heard us talk about extensively, both on this call and investor day, we have this year as well as have had last year an aggressive set of cost savings initiatives that will help benefit the business. So all in, I mean, we think that there is fairly significant margin expansion here, margin growth in FY ’25 as we move toward getting closer to our midterm growth algorithm — or midterm margin algorithm.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Kaumil Gajrawala with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question
Kaumil Gajrawala — Jefferies — Analyst
Just one quick follow-up on the shelf space question. You’ve gained a lot of shelf space already. Can you maybe just give us a sense of how much incremental space do you expect as we think about this spring? And then secondly, it looks like the strategic or I guess the valuation on wine and spirits is complete. To what degree did you consider divestments as part of it, either for pieces of that business or maybe even for the whole thing?
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Sure. As I stated, Kaumil in my primary remarks, low double-digit shelf space is what we expected to get, and that’s, in fact, what we are getting in spring resets. Obviously, it varies all over the map depending, but that’s roughly what the total number is in the aggregate. And again, that’s at least as much as we expected.
We’re very pleased with where that landed. Relative to the wine and spirits business, we’ve made this comment a number of times. The person that drinks across all three categories, beer, wine, and spirits spend six times as much as an individual that drinks only in one of those three categories. Therefore, we continue to feel that that’s important that we are accessing significant additional consumer occasions and consumer spending by being able to play in all three of those categories.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Nadine Sarwat with Bernstein. Please proceed with your question.
Nadine Sarwat — AllianceBernstein — Analyst
Two interrelated questions from me. First, you obviously posted very robust beer volume growth this quarter. What are you seeing in terms of the health of the U.S. consumer today? Any signs of down trading or shift in behavior? And then the second question also on the consumer.
Some of your industry peers have highlighted dry January being more meaningful headwind this year. Other commentators are calling out different drinking patterns among younger legal drinking age consumers. So I’d be really curious to hear what you are observing when it comes to these trends, any changes in behavior from the consumer.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Sure, Nadine. We’re very pleased with the health of our consumer. We’ve said many, many times, the brand loyalty that we have within our franchise is superb. And I think that’s really important.
I think when you put that together with the fact that — and Garth has mentioned this on a number of occasions, we’ve been judicious in our pricing strategy over the last few years which is a little bit different from what some other people have done in CPG industries. But we think that’s important to maintain that consumer base given the very strong loyalty that we have within our franchises. It’s also important to note that the high end, which is the only place where we compete in beer continues to see an increase in buy rate. So that again speaks to the fact that the consumer continues to premiumize, and we’re in the perfect position to take advantage of that particular point.
Relative to any consumer changes in January and so on, one of the things that we’ve noted a couple of times is betterment. We’ve done a number of things in our wine business to bring out light or lighter products like Illuminate and Kim Crawford, and Bright in Meiomi. Similarly, our Corona nonalcoholic had a great start. It was the No.
1 share gainer in the nonalcoholic segment. And I think that does reflect some change in consumer behavior or people that are concerned about being the designated driver but still want to enjoy an outstanding tasting beer. We’re going to continue to emphasize the betterment trends as we go forward with a number of our product offerings and certainly expect Corona nonalcoholic to continue to grow here in this coming fiscal year as well.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Andrea Teixeira with J.P. Morgan. Please proceed with your question.
Drew Levine — JPMorgan Chase and Company — Analyst
Hey, good morning. This is Drew Levine on for Andrea. So just two for us, if we may. Just going back to one of the earlier questions, Bill, if you can comment maybe on depletion trends outside of California versus inside California during the quarter and how those progressed throughout the quarter? And then one for Garth, I think you mentioned roughly $200 million of cost savings for beer in fiscal ’24.
I think that implies a pretty meaningful step up in the fourth quarter. So if you could just talk about maybe some of the projects where you saw a benefit and how we should be thinking about cost savings for fiscal ’25. Thank you.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Andrea, your voice got a lot lower since the last time you asked the question. All joking aside, our trends were very, very strong, really across the country. A significant place — let me use Pacifico, as an example, the depletions across that brand for the year were up 17%. And obviously, the big stronghold is California.
Modelo Especial continues to be the No. 1 brand in the state of California. But we’re also seeing really good success across the country, places like Texas and Florida. And secondary markets, we’ve always said secondary markets are going to be an important element for us and many, many, many of those showed double-digit increases over this past year.
So we were very pleased to see a broad-based growth profile for our business as we closed out the year, and we think we’re in a position to continue to do that here in fiscal ’25. Garth, I think the second one is for you.
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Just on the roughly $25 million of cost savings that came out of the beer business throughout the year, yes, that ramped up throughout the year. We started right out of the gate very strong in Q1. And again, that ramped up as we went through the year. The ramp up as we went through the year really based on two factors.
One is we identified or put in place new initiatives throughout the year, but then you also benefited from almost from a compounding perspective for those things that started earlier in the year as well. The kinds of initiatives that we undertook last year were procurement-related in terms of various RFPs around raw materials where we’re able to address some of the outsized increases that we saw over the last two years due to global supply chain disruptions, as well as the inflationary environment. There was a number of logistics initiatives in terms of railcars and double stacking and also a number of operational initiatives that were underway.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Rob Ottenstein with Evercore. Please proceed with your question.
Rob Ottenstein — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Great. Thank you very much. First, could you please just remind us what your gross dollar amount of expenses that are peso-denominated are? So that would be great. And then second, looking at the scanner data, and this is Circana, your price mix has been well below the beer category over the last four, 12 weeks or so.
So I’m trying to understand why that’s the case. And most of the other players took pricing kind of before or after the Super Bowl. And what is the timing on your price increases this year? And again, why is your apparent realization in the scanner data less than the market and most of the other big brands.
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So on the first one, in terms of the amount of costs that are peso-denominated for our beer business is about 20% to 25% of our costs are peso-denominated. And as I said, as we enter this year, we’re hedged at about 80%.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
And relative to price realization, as you know, a lot of what you see in these types of things depends on when pricing increases or pricing actions were taken. We consistently have said 1% to 2% is our pricing algorithm. And over the course of the whole year, we’re still expecting to see 1% to 2% pricing actions. As you also know, Robert, we do that on a SKU-by-SKU market-by-market basis, and therefore, you have reflections in different time frames across the year as to when that actually shows up.
I don’t think that’s anything that we are concerned about or any kind of an ongoing trend. And as we said, over the course of the year, we’ll expect to get 1% to 2% as we’ve communicated we would.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Filippo Falorni with Citi. Please proceed with your question.
Filippo Falorni — Citi — Analyst
Hey, good morning, everyone. I had a question on the overall beer industry and your thoughts as we are about to cycle the big market share shift with the controversy around Bud Light in April of last year. Clearly, your business was growing at this rate well above before this controversy, but there are some concerns that you might have benefited from the market share shift. So maybe you can address some of the impact that you see on your business and how you’re thinking about it as we start to cycle those impacts? Thank you.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Well, as we’ve said right along, we probably were not the single biggest gainer as it related to the controversy that you know. But I’d also, again, continue to point out something I said earlier, which is we’ve got extraordinarily strong brand loyalty and we only play in the high end. The high end is where the growth in the category is at the moment. And we’re fortunate that that’s exactly where we play.
When you add in the fact that we’ve seen a significant increase in our share growth in our shelf presence here during this spring reset program, we think we’re in a great position, recognized we are coming off the single biggest share gain in the history of Constellation Brands beer business, 2 points an all total beer and 2.6 points in the high end. It’s an unprecedented gain, and I think it reflects the sheer strength of our brands.
Operator
Thank you. The next question is from the line of Gerald Pascarelli with Wedbush Securities. Please proceed with your question.
Gerald Pascarelli — Wedbush Securities — Analyst
Great. Thanks very much. Just going back to wine, Bill, the drivers you laid out in your prepared remarks were very helpful. But based on current trends, I think the outlook for the year came in above expectations, definitely above our expectations.
So I guess in the context of 2 guide downs last year, if you could maybe provide some more commentary just on your level of confidence this early in the fiscal year in achieving flat revenue performance, that would be great. And then does your outlook embed the assumption that the wine category will ultimately start to improve from current levels this year?
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
I think, obviously, Garth and I spent a lot of time with our wine colleagues over the last few months, looking carefully at what we thought was critically important. The reflection of an improved performance has several variables involved. One, we’re going to work much more closely and enhance our sales capabilities to support our distributor network. I think we’ve gotten much more aligned as to what our intentions and expectations are, both from distributor to us and us to distributors than where we had been as we came out of last year.
Second, we’ve refocused our priorities. There are 11 or so critical brands that did not probably have the right amount of prioritization within our overall portfolio, and we have radically addressed that. Third, we’re going after efficiencies within the business, and we think there are those to be had. As you know, that was a tremendous success last year in our Beer business.
And we’re putting some of the same resources against our wine and spirits business that helped generate that very strong result last year. So there’s a number of elements that we are putting in place, recognizing this is going to be a bit of a reset year, particularly at the bottom line for the wine business. However, again, we’ve said we think the strategy is sound. It’s right.
It’s going to get us to our medium-term algorithms as we go forward. And at this point, it’s all about execution. And I think Sam Glaetzer and the rest of the team are going to be crystal-focused on execution against our strategy.
Operator
Our next question is from the line of Carlos Laboy with HSBC. Please proceed with your question.
Carlos Laboy — HSBC — Analyst
Yes, good morning, everyone. Can you please expand further on the state of on-premise activity that you saw toward your end and more important currently?
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
I think you saw some interesting volatility, depends on the particular time frame. And we saw some of that. We had an issue for a brief period during this year where we had some issues with kegs, which is now fully behind us. We’re continuing to see strong development in the on-premise, and we’re particularly excited about it heading into Cinco, which is obviously the next big time frame for us and a time frame when we historically have done very well and made significant share gains both in the retail and in the on-premise environment.
So we’re very optimistic that the on-premise is going to be an important part of what our results are this year. Both Modelo, Corona Extra, and Pacifico are all growing share in that channel, and we expect that that continued share growth is going to continue in this fiscal year.
Operator
Thank you. At this time, we’ve reached the end of the question-and-answer session, and I’ll hand the floor back to Bill Newlands for closing remarks.
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Rob, and thank you to all who joined today’s call. As we wrap up, I want to once again thank our colleagues across Constellation, as well as our trade partners for delivering another strong year of performance in fiscal ’24. Your continued focus and discipline has made Constellation a top-performing growth leader among CPG companies for 11 consecutive years. No other company in recent times can say that, and we’re extremely proud of this achievement.
As we head into fiscal ’25, we’re confident in our ability to further build on our momentum and to create additional shareholder value by delivering low double-digit EPS growth fueled primarily by our beer business, which we expect to generate high single-digit net sales growth and best-in-class operating margins, heightened focus on our commercial and operational execution in our wine and spirits business while maintaining our disciplined approach to capital allocation and continuing to serve as good stewards of our environment and the communities where we operate. As we approach the key summer selling season, we invite you to enjoy some of our great-tasting products as part of your festivities, and we look forward to speaking with you again on our next quarterly call. Thank you very much, and have a good day, everybody.
Operator
[Operator signoff]
Duration: 0 minutes
Call participants:
Snehal Shah — Director, Investor Relations
Bill Newlands — Chief Executive Officer
Garth Hankinson — Chief Financial Officer
Nik Modi — RBC Capital Markets — Analyst
Dara Mohsenian — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Bryan Spillane — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst
Lauren Lieberman — Barclays — Analyst
Chris Carey — Wells Fargo Securities — Analyst
Kaumil Gajrawala — Jefferies — Analyst
Nadine Sarwat — AllianceBernstein — Analyst
Drew Levine — JPMorgan Chase and Company — Analyst
Rob Ottenstein — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Filippo Falorni — Citi — Analyst
Gerald Pascarelli — Wedbush Securities — Analyst
Carlos Laboy — HSBC — Analyst
More STZ analysis
All earnings call transcripts
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani departs the U.S. District Courthouse after he was ordered to pay $148 million in his defamation case in Washington, U.S., December 15, 2023.
Bonnie Cash | Reuters
One of the largest donations to Rudy Giuliani’s legal defense fund is at the center of a new lawsuit that argues the $100,000 contribution rightfully belongs to victims of an alleged online fraud scheme.
The donation by Matthew Martorano in September accounted for nearly 13% of all the money that Giuliani, the former attorney for Donald Trump and onetime New York City mayor, raised in the fund.
The fund was intended to help Giuliani pay for lawyers in the Georgia election interference case — where Trump is a co-defendant — and in a civil defamation case that Giuliani lost, brought by two Georgia election workers.
But the plaintiff in the new civil suit — filed after CNBC reported on Martorano’s donation earlier this year — claims that $100,000 flowed from Martorano’s participation in an alleged online skin care product scam. They are seeking “to unwind” the donation to Giuliani.
There is no public evidence that Giuliani and Martorano know each other. CNBC has asked a spokesman for Giuliani if they did.
Still, the claim adds another layer of legal wrangling to the fight over Giuliani’s remaining assets. The former mayor filed for bankruptcy protection in December, after a judge ordered him to pay the election workers $146 million.
Giuliani “should give all the money back” that he received from Martorano, said Kevin Kneupper, the attorney who filed the lawsuit alleging fraudulent transfer in Fulton County against Martorano, his wife and corporate entities on behalf of his client, LeAnne Tan, who is also the named plaintiff in the federal racketeering lawsuit in California.
Giuliani spokesman Ted Goodman, in an email to CNBC, said, “This is a lawsuit unrelated to us.” He had no immediate additional comment.
CNBC requested comment from lawyers for Martorano, his wife, and the other defendants in both the Georgia lawsuit and a federal civil racketeering and fraud lawsuit in California related to the alleged skin care cream scam. None of them responded to the requests.
The scam
In early January, a judge in San Diego overseeing the federal lawsuit certified a nationwide class in the lawsuit against the alleged skin care sales scammers, as well as against Martorano, his wife Kathryn Martorano, their company called Konnektive LLC, and other connected entities, collectively known as the Konnektive defendants.
In her ruling, the judge wrote the plaintiff “has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Konnektive Defendants deceived banks and credit card companies.”
The suit alleges many people around the country were duped into signing up for a purported “free trial” of skin care cream products under the brand name La Pura.
“The scammers’ only goal is to fraudulently obtain the victim’s credit card or bank account information,” the suit says. “And once they have it, they begin billing their victims for subscriptions they never signed up for, never agreed to, and about which they were never properly informed.”
According to the complaint, Martorano’s company, Konnektive, provided software known as a “load balancer” to the entities that sold La Pura products and began charging people despite them being told it was a free trial offer.
The load balancer allegedly helps sellers hide from Visa and Mastercard the number of chargebacks from their customers. A high number of chargebacks — or reversal of charges to a customer’s account — is viewed by Visa and Mastercard as a sign of potential fraud, the suit notes.
“The Konnektive software was designed specifically for the purpose of facilitating automated bank fraud,” according to the federal suit. That complaint also says the software was specifically marketed to ” ‘free trial’ scammers at conferences which those scammers attend.”
Kneupper, who was appointed the class counsel in the class-action suit, told CNBC that the question of whether the Konnektive defendants will be held civilly liable for fraud “is ultimately going to go to a jury” to decide.
“But I think the evidence is compelling,” Kneupper added.
The new suit that Kneupper filed in Fulton County Superior Court in Georgia, names as defendants the Martoranos, Konnektive LLC, and two other corporate entities. Giuliani is not named as a defendant.
The new complaint says that as a result of the San Diego judge’s ruling on Martorano and the other Konnektive defendants, “it is highly likely that … the Class of injured consumers will prevail on the merits and will obtain a favorable verdict, which could easily exceed $30 million.”
Asset transfers
The Georgia suit says that Martorano and the other Konnektive defendants “are aware of this,” and as a result have begun “a series of asset transfers in a blatant attempt to avoid paying a potential eight-figure judgment in the Federal RICO Action to consumers who were injured by their fraud.”
The suit cites the fact that Martorano has also “recently begun making high-dollar political donations,” among them the $100,000 donation to Giuliani’s legal defense fund.
Then-President-elect Donald Trump meets with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the clubhouse of Trump National Golf Club November 20, 2016 in Bedminster, New Jersey.
Don Emmert | AFP | Getty Images
Martorano also donated $5,000 to the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee last year, $3,330 to Trump’s presidential campaign and $1,700 to Trump’s Save America political action committee, according to Federal Election Commission records.
And in November, Martorano and his wife also transferred a house and two properties in Georgia spanning 135 acres to a limited liability corporation, each time for a $0 purchase price, according to assessor offices’ records, the suit notes. The combined assessed and estimated value of the three properties was $4.1 million.
Read more CNBC politics coverage
Two of the property transactions occurred on Nov. 14, the same day that Kathryn Martorano was being deposed for the federal racketeering lawsuit. The other transaction occurred five days before the deposition, the suit says.
Kneupper questioned Matthew Martorano’s motive for donating to Giuliani, whose former client Trump is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
“You just ask, why is this guy donating 13 percent of the [legal defense] fund?” Kneupper told CNBC. “People don’t do it for no reason.”
Nancy Simonick, a Michigan woman who was charged for her La Pura offer despite the “free trial” offer, echoed Kneupper’s argument about Giuliani’s donation from Martorano.
“Oh, yeah, if he knew it was money gained through a scam, for sure he should give it back,” said Simonick, who has signed up as a member of the class suing the Martoranos and the other defendants in the California lawsuit.
One of Martorano’s lawyers in the Georgia case, Holly Pierson, also represents David Shafer, the former chair of the Georgia Republican Party, in a pending criminal case in Fulton County.
Shafer is a co-defendant with Giuliani, Trump, and a dozen more people in that criminal case, which accuses them of conspiracy in trying to overturn Trump’s 2020 presidential election loss in the state.
The defendants have pleaded not guilty.
Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO
Environmentalists protest as Biden administration approves huge oil export terminal off Texas coast
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a move that environmentalists called a betrayal, the Biden administration has approved the construction of a deepwater oil export terminal off the Texas coast that would be the largest of its kind in the United States.
The Sea Port Oil Terminal being developed off Freeport, Texas, will be able to load two supertankers at once, with an export capacity of 2 million barrels of crude oil per day. The $1.8 billion project by Houston-based Enterprise Products Partners received a deepwater port license from the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration this week, the final step in a five-year federal review.
Environmentalists denounced the license approval, saying it contradicted President Joe Biden’s climate agenda and would lead to “disastrous” planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to nearly 90 coal-fired power plants. The action could jeopardize Biden’s support from environmental allies and young voters already disenchanted by the Democratic administration’s approval last year of the massive Willow oil project in Alaska.
“Nothing about this project is in alignment with President Biden’s climate and environmental justice goals,” said Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at Earthworks, an environmental group that has long opposed the export terminal.
“The communities that will be impacted by (the oil terminal) have once again been ignored and will be forced to live with the threat of more oil spills, explosions and pollution,” Crane said. “The best way to protect the public and the climate from the harms of oil is to keep it in the ground.”
In a statement after the license was approved, the Maritime Administration said the project meets a number of congressionally mandated requirements, including extensive environmental reviews and a federal determination that the port’s operation is in the national interest.
“While the Biden-Harris administration is accelerating America’s transition to a clean energy future, action is also being taken to manage the transition in the near term,” said the agency, which is nicknamed MARAD.
The administration’s multiyear review included consultation with at least 20 federal, state and local agencies, MARAD said. The agency ultimately determined that the project would have no significant effect on the production or consumption of U.S. crude oil.
“Although the (greenhouse gas) emissions associated with the upstream production and downstream end use of the crude oil to be exported from the project may represent a significant amount of GHG emissions, these emissions largely already occur as part of the U.S. crude oil supply chain,” the agency said in an email to The Associated Press. “Therefore, the project itself is likely to have minimal effect on the current GHG emissions associated with the overall U.S. crude oil supply chain.”
Environmental groups scoffed at that claim.
“The Biden administration must stop flip-flopping on fossil fuels,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a nonprofit group that opposes the use of fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas.
“Approving the Sea Port Oil Terminal after pausing LNG exports is not just bad news for our climate, it’s incoherent politics,” DiPaola said. Biden “can’t claim to be a climate leader one day and then turn around and grant a massive handout to the oil industry the next. It’s time for President Biden to listen to the overwhelming majority of voters who want to see a shift away from fossil fuels, not a doubling down on dirty and deadly energy projects.”
DiPaola was referring to the administration’s January announcement that it is delaying consideration of new natural gas export terminals in the United States, even as gas shipments to Europe and Asia have soared since Russia invaded Ukraine.
The decision, announced at the start of the 2024 presidential election year, aligned the Democratic president with environmentalists who fear the huge increase in exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is locking in potentially catastrophic planet-warming emissions even as Biden has pledged to cut climate pollution in half by 2030.
Industry groups and Republicans have condemned the pause, saying LNG exports stabilize global energy markets, support thousands of American jobs and reduce global greenhouse emissions by transitioning countries away from coal, a far dirtier fossil fuel.
Enterprise CEO Jim Teague hailed the oil project’s approval. The terminal will provide “a more environmentally friendly, safe, efficient and cost-effective way to deliver crude oil to global markets,” he said in a statement.
The project will include two pipelines to carry crude from shore to the deepwater port, reducing the need for ship-to-ship transfers of oil. The terminal is expected to begin operations by 2027.
Since the project was first submitted for federal review in 2019, “Enterprise has worked diligently with various federal, state and local authorities, and participated in multiple public meetings that have allowed individuals and stakeholder groups to learn about the project and provide their comments,” including some studies that have been translated into Spanish and Vietnamese, the company said in a statement. More than half of Freeport’s 10,600 residents are Hispanic, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, hailed the license approval as “a major victory for Texas’s energy industry” and said the Biden administration had delayed the Sea Port terminal and other projects for years.
“After tireless work by my office and many others to secure this deepwater port license, I’m thrilled that we’re helping bring more jobs to Texas and greater energy security to America and our allies,” Cruz said in a statement. “That this victory was delayed by years of needless bureaucratic dithering shows why we need broader permitting reform in this country.”
The oil export facility, one of several license applications under federal review, is located 30 miles offshore of Brazoria County, Texas, in the Gulf of Mexico.
The license approval followed a ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week dismissing claims by environmental groups that federal agencies had failed to uphold federal environmental laws in their review of the project.

In many ways for many investors, Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) is a model dividend stock. The company is a Dividend King, meaning it has raised its shareholder payout at least once annually for a minimum of 50 years. Its current streak stands at a hard-to-conceive 62 straight years.
Coca-Cola management is well aware that the dividend is a big part of the stock’s attraction. That’s probably a key reason it raised the payout by a relatively high 5%-plus back in February. Let’s take a closer look at that raise and whether it indicates the company is a relatively flat investment these days — or still has enough fizz to make it a worthy buy.
A fizzy drink, and a fizzy business
While Coca-Cola is most often associated with its signature beverage, it’s important to note that as a business it’s much more a collection of drink brands.
Many consumers, and even investors, don’t realize that in addition to the various versions and flavors of Coke the beverage, the company also holds such familiar items as Minute Maid orange juice, Schweppes soft drinks and mixers, and Powerade sports beverages in its portfolio. In certain European city centers, the company’s Costa Coffee chain isn’t far away from Starbucks levels of ubiquity.
No other business on this planet has that kind of lineup; Coca-Cola doesn’t hesitate to boast that it holds over 200 brands of drinks. That sets it apart from the company many consider to be its archrival, PepsiCo, as the latter’s portfolio is stuffed with both beverages and snack foods.
For Coca-Cola, it almost goes without saying that Coke the drink is the 800-pound gorilla of its product selection. Yet, that dizzying array of other drinks gives it the room to push a popular beverage category, or a single hot product, in order to juice (pun intended) its fundamentals.
And since Coke is eternally beloved by many consumers throughout the planet, the company can also kick its prices a bit higher if it needs a jolt to the fundamentals.
With these strengths, Coca-Cola usually finds a way to grow despite its size and maturity as a company. Revenue rose by more than 6% last year over the 2022 tally, to almost $46 billion, and was up by nearly 40% if we place it against the 2020 result.
Profitability has wobbled a bit, but usually comes in strong. This is a disciplined company that sells a hugely popular good that’s cheap to make. Its nearly $46 billion in revenue across 2023 filtered down into a headline net income of $10.7 billion, for a very sugary margin of over 23%. That’s consistent as Coca-Cola’s net margin has hovered within a tight band of 22% to 25% over the past five years.
Meanwhile, the company’s free cash flow (FCF) is a thing of beauty. It isn’t growing as consistently as revenue, but that’s not much of a worry since it’s landed just shy of $10 billion in each of the past two years. That’s more than enough to fund the dividend, which cost the company a bit under $8 billion in 2023.
But is it a good buy?
Stocks, of course, trade on future potential and valuations far more than historical performance. Coca-Cola’s growth is expected to flatten a bit this year, with the average analyst projection of only marginal growth. 2025 should be better, as those prognosticators are modeling a nearly 5% jump on the top line. Profitability looks a little tastier, given that the collective estimate for 2024 per-share net income growth is 4% this year and nearly 7% in 2025.
As for valuations, Coca-Cola stock currently trades at a forward P/E of nearly 24, which on first glance might seem rich given that anticipated single-digit growth. Yet we also have to factor in that dividend, which the company is unlikely to stop increasing and already boasts an attractive yield of 3.2%, well above the average for the S&P 500 index, of which it’s a component.
So for me, this is a fine stock for the buy-and-hold types out there. I can’t foresee this company ever losing money, and the stacks of cash flow it can produce should allow it to maintain its Dividend King status for a long time to come. I’ve been a Coca-Cola bull for years now, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
Should you invest $1,000 in Coca-Cola right now?
Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $522,969!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 8, 2024
Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Starbucks. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Is Coca-Cola Stock a Screaming Buy After Its Big Dividend Raise? was originally published by The Motley Fool
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell attends a “Fed Listens” event in Washington, DC, on October 4, 2019.
Eric Baradat | AFP | Getty Images
A hotter-than-expected consumer price index report rattled Wall Street Wednesday, but markets are buzzing about an even more specific prices gauge contained within the data — the so-called supercore inflation reading.
Along with the overall inflation measure, economists also look at the core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, to find the true trend. The supercore gauge, which also excludes shelter and rent costs from its services reading, takes it even a step further. Fed officials say it is useful in the current climate as they see elevated housing inflation as a temporary problem and not as good a measure of underlying prices.
Supercore accelerated to a 4.8% pace year over year in March, the highest in 11 months.
Tom Fitzpatrick, managing director of global market insights at R.J. O’Brien & Associates, said if you take the readings of the last three months and annualize them, you’re looking at a supercore inflation rate of more than 8%, far from the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal.
“As we sit here today, I think they’re probably pulling their hair out,” Fitzpatrick said.
An ongoing problem
CPI increased 3.5% year over year last month, above the Dow Jones estimate that called for 3.4%. The data pressured equities and sent Treasury yields higher on Wednesday, and pushed futures market traders to extend out expectations for the central bank’s first rate cut to September from June, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool.
“At the end of the day, they don’t really care as long as they get to 2%, but the reality is you’re not going to get to a sustained 2% if you don’t get a key cooling in services prices, [and] at this point we’re not seeing it,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Santander U.S.
Wall Street has been keenly aware of the trend coming from supercore inflation from the beginning of the year. A move higher in the metric from January’s CPI print was enough to hinder the market’s “perception the Fed was winning the battle with inflation [and] this will remain an open question for months to come,” according to BMO Capital Markets head of U.S. rates strategy Ian Lyngen.
Another problem for the Fed, Fitzpatrick says, lies in the differing macroeconomic backdrop of demand-driven inflation and robust stimulus payments that equipped consumers to beef up discretionary spending in 2021 and 2022 while also stoking record inflation levels.
Today, he added, the picture is more complicated because some of the most stubborn components of services inflation are household necessities like car and housing insurance as well as property taxes.
“They are so scared by what happened in 2021 and 2022 that we’re not starting from the same point as we have on other occasions,” Fitzpatrick added. “The problem is, if you look at all of this [together] these are not discretionary spending items, [and] it puts them between a rock and a hard place.”
Sticky inflation problem
Further complicating the backdrop is a dwindling consumer savings rate and higher borrowing costs which make the central bank more likely to keep monetary policy restrictive “until something breaks,” Fitzpatrick said.
The Fed will have a hard time bringing down inflation with more rate hikes because the current drivers are stickier and not as sensitive to tighter monetary policy, he cautioned. Fitzpatrick said the recent upward moves in inflation are more closely analogous to tax increases.
While Stanley opines that the Fed is still far removed from hiking interest rates further, doing so will remain a possibility so long as inflation remains elevated above the 2% target.
“I think by and large inflation will come down and they’ll cut rates later than we thought,” Stanley said. “The question becomes are we looking at something that’s become entrenched here? At some point, I imagine the possibility of rate hikes comes back into focus.”
Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO
Even with $300, many Buffett investments are within reach of the average investor.
Warren Buffett became one of the world’s best-known investors through his long track record of consistency. Since 1965, his portfolio has earned an average yearly gain of 20%, approximately double that of the S&P 500.
However, with Buffett now in his 90s, many investment decisions are in the hands of his lieutenants, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. This has changed the philosophy of Berkshire Hathaway a bit, and to that end, it incorporates more growth stocks.
Consequently, investors — even with a modest budget of $300 — can find some intriguing growth stocks in the Berkshire portfolio that could deliver market-beating returns over time.
Amazon
Berkshire did not buy Amazon (AMZN 1.67%) until 2019. As to why it took so long to buy, Buffett said he was “too dumb” to buy Amazon earlier. He was long skeptical of tech stocks but, in time, came to realize the staying power of such businesses.
Now, Amazon is the world’s second-largest retailer, according to the National Retail Federation. Moreover, it pioneered the cloud computing business through Amazon Web Services (AWS), a segment that now accounts for most of the company’s operating income.
Additionally, it operates fast-growth businesses such as digital advertising, online seller services, and its subscription service, known to the public as Amazon Prime. They helped generate revenue of $575 billion in 2023, a 12% increase from last year. This made it a highly diversified business that investors can buy for around $185 per share right now.
Admittedly, Amazon’s forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 44 may appear expensive, considering that investors often associate Buffett with finding bargains. Still, investors should remember that Amazon has always sold at a high multiple, and the portfolio has sought more expensive stocks since Buffett handed off some investment decisions to others.
Ultimately, with a comparatively reasonable valuation and its diverse business lines, it should remain a stock that serves Buffett and other investors well.
Nu Holdings
NuBank parent Nu Holdings (NU -0.17%) is one of the world’s largest online banks, but since it only operates in Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, it is likely not on the radar of most investors. Nonetheless, it probably should be, and not just because Berkshire was an early investor in this business.
Nu presents a unique opportunity since just a few institutions had previously dominated banking in this region. For that reason, a large percentage of the population did not have a bank account or credit card. Nu has changed this by issuing the first credit card to millions of Brazilians. Now, 53% of all adult Brazilians (88 million of Nu’s 94 million customers) have at least one account with Nu.
Additionally, the company is now repeating this formula in Mexico and Colombia, meaning its rapid growth can continue. So fast is this growth that the company’s $8 billion in revenue for 2023 grew 68% over the previous year.
Moreover, with the stock at around $12 per share, investors can not only buy a few shares with a $300 budget but also buy at levels just above its IPO price from late 2021. Furthermore, at a forward P/E ratio of 31, the shares are priced reasonably when considering the outsized revenue growth of this fintech stock.
DaVita
DaVita (DVA -0.50%) is probably not a company most investors think of as a growth stock. It offers kidney dialysis to more than 200,000 patients in the U.S. and 10 other countries.
However, the need for such services never disappears, making it the type of business that has always drawn Buffett’s attention. Additionally, approximately 10,000 baby boomers age into Medicare every day, and chronic kidney disease affects about 34% of U.S. adults aged 65 or older. While that may serve as a warning to watch one’s kidney health, it also means a growing customer base for DaVita as kidney disease rises.
Admittedly, considering that its 2023 revenue of $12 billion grew by only 5%, it may not look like much of a “growth” business. Nonetheless, the stock has been in a state of recovery as excess deaths (due to COVID-19) and missed appointments weighed on its performance for most of 2022, and rising labor costs have remained an ongoing challenge.
Moreover, analysts expect its cost-cutting to boost net income by 21% in 2024. Thus, considering its P/E ratio is around 18, the stock is arguably a bargain. Also, with the stock trading at about $135 per share as of the time of this writing, investors with a $300 budget can afford its shares. Investors who follow Buffett’s lead will likely continue to profit from this healthcare stock.
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Will Healy has positions in Berkshire Hathaway and Nu Holdings. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends Nu Holdings. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


