Fitch Ratings downgrades China outlook to negative as economic concerns rise
Source link
concerns
Aave considers dropping DAI as collateral over contagion concerns from MakerDAO’s USDe move
Marc Zeller, the founder of the Aavechan Initiative, has proposed to the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) overseeing Aave to remove DAI stablecoin’s collateral status within the protocol’s lending ecosystem.
This move comes in response to MakerDAO’s proposal to allocate 600 million DAI into the fast-rising synthetic dollar USDe and staked USDe (sUSDe) through the DeFi lending protocol Morpho Labs.
MakerDAO’s proposal
An analysis by Block Analitica, a prominent MakerDAO advisory council member, highlighted the robust user demand for USDe-backed lending pools within the MakerDAO ecosystem. According to the firm, this demand is primarily fueled by the enticing yield-earning prospects of USDe and the opportunity to acquire ENA tokens.
The analysis suggested a strategic focus on higher leverage USDe pools, particularly those with LLTV ratios of 86% and 91.5%, accompanied by a proportionally larger allocation of DAI.
Ethena USDe is a synthetic dollar supported by several stakeholders within the community. The digital asset has garnered significant attention from both retail and institutional traders owing to its impressive annual yield potential, reaching up to 27% at a certain point.
Despite its allure, some crypto community members have voiced concerns regarding Ethena’s risk profile.
However, Seraphim Czecker, Ethena’s Head of Growth, expressed satisfaction with Ethena’s growth, affirming that it aligns with internal projections. As of the press time, the total market capitalization of USDe stands at $1.6 billion. Aave founder Stani Kulechov called the situation a “Very risky move for DeFi.”
‘Contagion risks’
Zeller explained that his proposal was necessary to “mitigate potential contagion risks for the Aave users.”
According to him, MakerDAO’s latest decision might heighten the risk of utilizing DAI as collateral. He further stressed that an Ethena’s failure could profoundly impact DAI, potentially leading to contagion risks.
He wrote:
“With the potential extension of this credit line to 1 billion DAI in the near term, the unpredictability of future governance decisions by MakerDAO raises concerns regarding the inherent risk nature of DAI as collateral.”
Consequently, he proposed that Aave lowers the risk of contagion by setting the DAI loan-to-value ratio (LTV) to 0% across all versions of the Aave protocol. Additionally, he suggested removing staked DAI boosters from the merit program starting from the Merit Round 2 and subsequent rounds.
The post Aave considers dropping DAI as collateral over contagion concerns from MakerDAO’s USDe move appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Peter Schiff Warns of Severe Economic Repercussions, Highlights Inflation and Money Supply Concerns
In a recent analysis, economist Peter Schiff draws stark comparisons between the current U.S. economic optimism and the prelude to the 2008 financial crisis. Schiff, leveraging his expertise, warns of impending financial turmoil, emphasizing the critical role of money supply in understanding economic health. Peter Schiff Warns: U.S. Economy on the Brink, Echoes of 2008 […]
Source link
This American City Is Offering $1 Homes In Its Crime-Filled Neighborhoods, Sparking Concerns of Gentrification And Violence

With home affordability near its lowest level in over 40 years because of high mortgage rates and home prices, being able to purchase a home for $1 might seem impossible.
However, the city of Baltimore is offering a deal intended to attract new homebuyers. It’s practically giving away houses.
An estimated 13,000 homes in Baltimore are vacant with the city owning about 1,000 of them.
Don’t Miss:
For now, 200 of these properties have been approved to be marketed to Baltimore residents who commit to both living in and fixing up the properties, with city officials saying properties in the program are in the city’s most “stressed” housing markets.
The program was approved despite objections from City Council President Nick Mosby, who said that the new policy left him “deeply concerned.”
“If affordability and affordable home ownership and equity and all of the nice words we like to use are really at the core competency as it relates to property disposition, this is a really bad policy … because it doesn’t protect or prioritize the rights of folks in these communities,” Mosby said.
Other city officials pushed back on the characterization, pointing out that there is a 90-day window that gives Baltimore locals the right to buy before outsiders are allowed to make bids.
Trending: Fortnite’s creator company greenlights partial ownership for investors in the upcoming series.
It’s worth noting that the $1 deal isn’t available to everyone — just individual buyers and community land trusts. Still, developers would only have to pay $3,000, leading to possible opportunities for large profits if home values in the areas increase.
While the chance to get a home for $1 might sound like anyone could participate in the city’s offerings, a prospective buyer needs to be able to afford the costs to make many of these vacant homes safe to live in.
To help contribute to the initiative, the city is also giving out home-repair grants of up to $50,000 to individuals who prequalify for a construction loan.
Resident Maurice Brock warned of the dangers from these properties, telling WJZ-TV in Baltimore, “There are so many risks and hazards associated with these vacant properties … it’s a definite safety risk for citizens, for city employees and firefighters.”
Given that the city of Baltimore regularly ranks in the top five U.S. cities for violent crime, safety concerns are valid, especially as these properties are already in some of the toughest areas of the city.
Prospective homeowners or investors looking to invest in real estate without the headache of owning the actual property can consider purchasing real estate investment trust (REIT) stocks or buying into a fund such as the Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF (NYSE:VNQ), which invests in a diversified basket of REITs.
Read More:
“ACTIVE INVESTORS’ SECRET WEAPON” Supercharge Your Stock Market Game with the #1 “news & everything else” trading tool: Benzinga Pro – Click here to start Your 14-Day Trial Now!
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
This article This American City Is Offering $1 Homes In Its Crime-Filled Neighborhoods, Sparking Concerns of Gentrification And Violence originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Sybil attack concerns spark controversy for EtherFi airdropped ETHFI token
Liquid restaking platform EtherFi’s ETHFI token has faced considerable struggles since its airdrop, partly due to one of its early investors selling their airdropped tokens.
Blockchain analytical firm Nansen reported how Arrington XRP Capital, one of EtherFi’s investors, allegedly may have gamed EtherFi’s airdrop process for personal profit.
Arrington ‘sybils’ EtherFi
Nansen’s findings reveal that Arrington XRP Capital staked 5,000 ETH across ten separate wallets, each containing 500 ETH. This move allowed the firm to claim the ETHFI airdrop from ten separate wallets, amassing 200,498 ETHFI tokens.
Subsequently, all the airdropped tokens were transferred to the Binance crypto exchange, suggesting the firm might have divested its holdings.
Such maneuvers, known as Sybil attacks, are usually frowned upon in the industry as they enable individuals to manipulate a network by utilizing multiple identities and potentially circumventing vesting schedules.
Several community members, including blockchain sleuth ZachXBT, immediately voiced concerns about Arrington XRP Capital’s actions while highlighting the unfair advantages the project gained.
Since the March 18 airdrop, ETHFI’s price has faced considerable sell-pressure, declining by more than 32% within the last three days to as low as $2.83 before rebounding to $3.24 as of press time, according to CoinMarketCap data.
EtherFi and Arrington defend action.
EtherFi’s team defended Arrington’s action, asserting that the investment firm duly informed it about the multiple wallet staking strategy.
According to EtherFi, Arrington belonged to the top-tier staker category, with a linear distribution model in place. Consequently, the multiple wallets did not equate to the firm garnering additional points.
The project added:
“These assets, including the ETHFI tokens is a very small percentage of their position and it’s part of their liquid fund which is actively traded, and that is the reason the assets were moved to Binance.”
Despite this explanation, some community members remained skeptical, suggesting that Arrington’s maneuver might have been a means to bypass the three-month vesting period applicable to wallets holding over 25,000 ETHFI tokens.
In response, EtherFi stated that Arrington was unaware of the vesting period, as the decision was made shortly before the airdrop.
Meanwhile, Arrington Capital also denied Sybil attacking EtherFi, saying:
“This was not a sybil attack and did not take advantage of the protocol’s distribution methodology. Because each account was over a minimum threshold in value, the airdrop distribution was linear. This means that the total number of ETHFI tokens airdropped to our wallets is the same as if all the eETH was in one wallet.”
It further explained that it only sold a small percentage of its ETHFI allocation, amounting to just $700,000, representing a tiny percentage of its overall position in the project.
Mentioned in this article
Latest Alpha Market Report
Are Cheerios and Quaker Oats safe? Experts weigh in on new pesticide concerns.
Should you pass on that morning bowl of cereal or oatmeal?
That’s what some people may be asking in light of a study released this week by the Environmental Working Group, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit focused on agricultural and chemical-safety laws in the U.S. The study looked at the prevalence of a pesticide called chlormequat in oat-based food products, including cereals like Cheerios and Quaker Oats.
The EWG said it found detectable levels of the chemical in 92% of nonorganic oat-based foods purchased in May 2023.
“Studies in laboratory animals show that chlormequat can cause harm to the normal growth and development of the fetus and damage the reproductive system,” Olga Naidenko, vice president at the EWG, told MarketWatch. Those risks, the EWG report noted, can include reduced fertility.
It has not been proven that the substance affects humans in the same way the studies cited by the EWG found it does lab animals, and there are other studies that have found chlormequat had no effect on reproduction in pigs or mice, or any impact on fertilization rates in mice.
The EWG is still advocating that concerned consumers buy organic oat products as an alternative, however.
“Certified organic oats are, by law, grown without synthetic pesticides,” Naidenko said.
Representatives for General Mills
GIS,
the company that makes Cheerios, and PepsiCo
PEP,
which owns Quaker Oats, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
“‘Any family raising kids or thinking about starting a family should do whatever they can do to avoid chlormequat. It’s not a safe product.’”
— Charles Benbrook, a scientific consultant who focuses on pesticides
The EWG’s recommendation to go organic was echoed by experts that MarketWatch contacted.
Charles Benbrook, a scientific consultant based in Washington state who focuses on pesticides, said he’s an oatmeal eater who chooses organic oatmeal “when I can get it.”
Regarding chlormequat, Benbrook said, “It’s not a safe product.”
“Any family raising kids or thinking about starting a family should do whatever they can do to avoid chlormequat,” he said.
Melissa Furlong, an assistant professor of environmental health sciences at the University of Arizona, said it’s important to note that chlormequat is not the only pesticide that is found in oat-based cereals. There’s still much we need to learn about the health effects the substance might have on humans, she added.
“That’s not to say it isn’t the worst [pesticide]. We don’t really know,” Furlong said.
Chlormequat has not been approved for use on food crops grown in the U.S., according to the EWG, but it can be found in oats and oat products from other countries. Under the Trump administration, the Environmental Protection Agency started allowing imports of such products into the U.S., the EWG noted, which is why chlormequat can be found in some cereals sold in this country.
The EPA is considering approving chlormequat for use on crops grown in the U.S., according to the agency’s website. In a call for public comment on its proposed decision, the agency said, “Based on EPA’s human health risk assessment, there are no dietary, residential, or aggregate (i.e., combined dietary and residential exposures) risks of concern.”
The EPA didn’t respond immediately to a request for comment.
For her part, Furlong said that while she usually buys organic oat products, she isn’t rigid about it — and she might still buy the occasional box of Cheerios.
In a recent meeting with the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Piero Cipollone, a member of the ECB Executive Board, discussed the forthcoming digital euro, specifically its privacy features, infrastructure procurement, and operational standards.
Cipollone’s presentation emphasized the ECB’s proactive approach to collaborating with EU-based entities for the digital currency’s infrastructure. He added that all these entities are registered within the EU and controlled by an EU national.
Privacy concerns
Privacy considerations were a key focus of Cipollone’s remarks. He assured the Parliament that the digital euro would feature superior privacy protections compared to existing commercial payment solutions and include anonymous offline payment transactions.
The ECB executive detailed the planned privacy features of the digital euro, stating that it would collect only a minimal set of pseudonymized data necessary for operations such as settlement. This approach is intended to enhance online payment privacy, addressing public concerns over data protection in digital transactions.
For online transactions, the ECB would access only a necessary, pseudonymized data set for operational purposes like settlement, promising users greater data control than current private payment systems offer.
Moreover, according to Cipollone, the digital euro is designed with top-tier cybersecurity measures to safeguard user data and transactions.
Cipollone said the digital euro has been designed to mirror the accessibility and reliability of cash, thereby reducing reliance on global payment processors and ensuring uniform service across the eurozone. He added:
“Cash and a digital euro have the same objective: ensuring that everyone, regardless of their income, can pay in any situation of daily life. This is a fundamental right. And it should be protected in the same way in all parts of the euro area.”
He likened the digital euro’s infrastructure to public railways, suggesting it would be state-owned yet accessible to various private operators.
Implementation and stability
Cipollone also touched on the importance of a digital euro rulebook to ensure consistent implementation across the eurozone, aiming to reduce dependency on international payment processors by providing a uniform set of rules, standards, and procedures.
Addressing financial stability, the ECB executive outlined measures to prevent the digital euro from competing with traditional savings accounts, including interest-free holdings and restrictions on the digital euro’s accumulation by corporations and financial institutions.
He also mentioned plans to facilitate seamless transactions by linking CBDC wallets with bank accounts, circumventing the need for wallet pre-funding.
The dialogue between the ECB and the European Parliament is part of the preparatory phase for the digital euro, with the ECB providing technical input to co-legislators. The ECB’s efforts aim to prepare for a potential digital euro launch within a framework that prioritizes privacy, operational readiness, and financial stability.
U.S. prosecutors have requested a special hearing to delve into potential conflicts of interest involving lawyers representing two notable figures in the crypto world: Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the former CEO of FTX, and Alex Mashinsky, the former head of Celsius Network.
Both individuals are currently facing criminal charges related to fraud after their respective companies collapsed due to mismanagement.
The request for a Curcio hearing, aimed at addressing these potential legal conflicts, was made in letters sent to the judges presiding over the cases against SBF and Mashinsky on Feb. 6.
Curcio hearing
At the heart of the concern are attorneys Marc Mukasey and Torrey Young, who have registered their appearances in both cases, raising questions about the potential for conflicting interests.
The intertwining of FTX and Celsius, as outlined by prosecutors, highlights the complex web of financial transactions and relationships that define this legal saga.
Notably, Celsius had engaged in financial dealings with Alameda Research, an entity closely associated with SBF, with some transactions reportedly involving the use of customer funds. This intricate relationship between the two companies has led to concerns over whether the legal representation of SBF and Mashinsky could be compromised.
Prosecutors have pointed out that the narrative surrounding the collapse of Celsius has included allegations by Mashinsky that Alameda Research played a role in the downfall, potentially implicating SBF’s actions.
This situation presents a scenario where the legal arguments of one defendant could inadvertently impact the defense of the other. The government’s letters to the court suggest that, despite these potential conflicts, the issues may not be insurmountable.
The judges can waive these concerns if they deem them manageable, allowing SBF and Mashinsky to proceed with their current legal representation, provided they are fully informed of the risks and consent to it.
Legal troubles
SBF’s legal troubles began with his indictment in 2022 following the collapse of FTX. After being extradited from the Bahamas to the U.S., he faced a jury trial that concluded with his conviction on multiple felony fraud charges.
His sentencing is scheduled for March 28, amid speculation that he may not face a second trial originally set for March 2024 due to his prior conviction.
Alex Mashinsky faces his own set of charges, including securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud, stemming from his tenure at Celsius. He stepped down as CEO in September 2022 and is currently out on bail, with his trial set for Sept. 17.
As the U.S. government intensifies its scrutiny of cryptocurrency-related crimes, the outcomes of these cases could set significant precedents for legal standards and enforcement in the digital currency space.
Tether CEO bashes JPMorgan’s ‘hypocrisy’ amid stablecoin dominance concerns
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino slammed Wall Street giant JPMorgan’s “hypocrisy” to raise concerns about the stablecoin issuer’s dominant position in the cryptocurrency market while being the “biggest bank in the world.”
In a Feb. 2 statement sent to CryptoSlate, Ardoino stated that Tether’s market dominance has proven crucial for the emerging industry despite the negative perceptions that its competitors and banks have about it.
“Tether’s market domination may be a ‘negative’ for competitors including those in the banking industry wishing for similar success but it’s never been a negative for the markets that need us the most,” Ardoino quipped.
On Feb. 1, JPMorgan expressed apprehensions about Tether’s impact on the broader crypto market, citing concerns about its “lack of regulatory compliance and transparency.” The Wall Street giant also expressed fears of how Tether poses a risk for crypto due to its deep integration within the system
Furthermore, the bank compared Tether unfavorably to Circle, noting the latter’s greater regulatory compliance.
However, these comments were met with a stiff reaction from Ardoino who defended Tether’s resilience, citing its performance during last year’s banking crisis, and highlighted the company’s collaboration with regulators to enhance understanding of blockchain technology.
“Tether demonstrated more resilience in a black swan event than several major U.S. banks last year. As we recognize the significance of our invention, we’ve always worked closely with global regulators to educate them on the technology and provide guidance on how they must think about it,” Ardoino stated.
The Tether CEO further chimed that JPMorgan’s comments “seems hypocritical” because it is “from the biggest bank in the world.” He expressed concern about such remarks from a bank that has incurred nearly $40 billion in fines and encouraged JPMorgan to draw lessons from Tether’s success in the stablecoin sector.
Tether’s USDT is the largest stablecoin by market capitalization and one of the most popular digital assets. The stablecoin has seen its market share rapidly expand during the past year, thanks to the regulatory issues that has impacted rivals like Circle’s USDC and Binance-backed BUSD.
Tether’s latest attestaion report showed that this dominance translated into a net profit of 10% of JPMorgan’s earnings for the last quarter of 2023.
The post Tether CEO bashes JPMorgan’s ‘hypocrisy’ amid stablecoin dominance concerns appeared first on CryptoSlate.
A Carvana sign and signature vending machine in Tempe, Ariz.
Michael Wayland/CNBC
PHOENIX – As layoffs and cost cuts roil Wall Street, from retail and shipping to tech and media, embattled online used car sales giant Carvana says its own restructuring is in the rear view.
Carvana over the last 18 months aggressively restructured its operations and debt amid bankruptcy concerns to pivot from growth to cost-cutting. They were crucial moves for the company and its largest shareholders, including CEO and Chairman Ernie Garcia III and his father, Ernie Garcia II. The two control 88% of Carvana through special voting shares.
The efforts thus far have been successful, propelling Carvana’s stock last year from less than $5 per share to more than $55 to begin 2024 – marking a significant turnaround for the company, but still a far cry from the stock’s all-time high of more than $370 per share reached during the coronavirus pandemic in 2021. Shares closed Thursday at $42.53.
“We have every intention of continuing to make progress and don’t expect to return to a situation like that,” the younger Garcia told CNBC about the company’s dire circumstances. “I think the pressure of the last two years caused us to really focus on the most important things.”
The Tempe, Arizona-based company has taken $1.1 billion of annualized expenses out of the business; reduced headcounts by more than 4,000 people; and launched a new proprietary “Carli” software platform for end-to-end processing of vehicle reconditioning as well as other “AI,” or machine learning, systems for pricing and sales. The systems replaced previous processes that involved manually inputting data into separate systems or spreadsheets.
The result, Carvana hopes, is better footing to navigate an automotive industry that’s shifting and normalizing from a supply-constrained environment to one with less favorable pricing power for dealers.
Return to growth
Carvana has been a growth story since its initial public offering in 2017. It posted growing sales every year from its 2012 founding through 2022, when restructuring began.
The business concept of Carvana is simple: buy and sell used cars. But the process behind it is extremely complicated, labor-intensive and expensive.
Carvana puts each vehicle it intends to sell through a lengthy inspection, repair and sale preparation process. It ranges from fixing scratches, dents and other imperfections to engine and powertrain components. There’s also significant logistical costs and processes for delivering vehicles to consumers’ homes and the company’s signature car vending machines across the country.
A Ford F-150 is prepped for a painting booth at Carvana’s vehicle reconditing center outside Phoenix. The vehicle is wrapped so only the spot needed to be repainted is showing.
Michael Wayland / CNBC
In 2022, retail sales declined roughly 3%. Headed into the fourth quarter of last year, they were down a further 27%.
Carvana is currently in the “middle of step two” of a three-step restructuring that Garcia initially laid out to investors roughly a year ago.
Step 1: Drive the business to break even on an adjusted EBITDA basis. Step 2: Drive the business to significant positive unit economics, including positive free cash flow. Step 3: Return to growth.
“We’re trying to stay really focused on just building the business as best we can,” Garcia said during a rare, wide-ranging interview at a Carvana vehicle reconditioning center near Phoenix in mid-January.
The CEO, sitting under a “Don’t be a Richard” poster featuring former President Richard “Dick” Nixon (it’s one of Carvana’s six core values), says the company is largely done with taking fixed costs out of the business, but he believes there’s more room for reductions in variable costs to increase profits before returning to a growth-focused company again.
Wall Street largely agrees.
Carvana CEO and cofounder Ernie Garcia III
Screenshot
“We walked away confident that CVNA has room to further improve its cost structure and drive additional operational efficiencies. These efficiencies would come from three main areas: the further development of internal software, standardized processes, and improved training and career pathing,” said JPMorgan analyst Rajat Gupta in a December analyst note following an investor briefing and tour of a Carvana reconditioning center in Florida.
At the end of the third quarter, Carvana had $544 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand, up $228 million from the end of the previous year. The company reported total liquidity, including additional secured debt capacity and other factors, of $3.18 billion.
It recorded a record third-quarter gross profit per unit sold of $5,952, while cutting selling, general, and administrative expenses by more than $400 per unit sold compared to the prior quarter.
The company reports its fourth-quarter results on Feb. 22.
New era, new tech
At the center of much of Carvana’s cost reductions is new tech to optimize operations.
The company introduced Carli, a host of software “solutions” or apps for each part of reconditioning a vehicle. The suite of tools records inspections and reconditioning of inbound vehicles step by step, including price checks and benchmarking costs for parts and overall expenses per vehicle. It’s followed by other systems to assess market value and sales prices for each vehicle.
The systems helped contribute to $900 in cost savings per unit in retail reconditioning and inbound transport costs over past 12 months.
“We rolled Carli out across all sites. It’s a single, consistent, much more granular inventory management system,” said Doug Guan, Carvana senior director of inventory analytics, who formerly led expansion for Instacart. “That’s what we’ve been focused on for the last year and a half.”
Each vehicle that enters Carvana’s reconditioning center has a barcode sticker to assist in tracking the vehicle through its process as it prepares to be sold.
Michael Wayland / CNBC
Guan, who started at Carvana in 2020, is among a new group of hires from a variety of backgrounds that range from Silicon Valley tech startups to more traditional vehicle operations such as CarMax, Ford Motor and Nissan Motor.
Carvana’s offices, where it shares a campus with State Farm, feel a lot like a startup. On a floor housing customer support, music blares – the likes of Coldplay to Neil Diamond. A black-and-gold gong sits nearby to celebrate when costumer service reps, internally called “advocates,” assist customers in a sale, among other milestones.
Other than Carli, Carvana has built custom tools to support its inbound and outbound logistics activities that have driven down costs by about $200 per unit. These include mapping, route optimization, driver schedule management, and pickup/drop-off window availability, including same-day delivery, which the company recently launched in certain markets.
The customer care team has also recently begun piloting generative artificial intelligence for some requests, including automatically summarizing customer calls, training AI to act as an “advocate” and incorporate the company’s values: be brave; zag forward; don’t be a Richard; your next customer may be your mom; there are no sidelines; we’re all in this together.
A black-and-gold gong sits nearby to celebrate when costumer service reps, internally called “advocates,” assist customers in a sale, among other milestones.
Michael Wayland / CNBC
“Customer experience has been No. 1 at the heart of everything that we do, which I think after being here all these years, it’s amazing to say that still very, very true statement,” said Teresa Aragon, Carvana vice president of customer experience and the company’s first employee outside of its three cofounders.
In 2023, Carvana’s customer care team under Aragon handled 1.3 million calls and another 1.3 million chats and texts, according to stats posted on a bathroom flier called “Learning on the Loo” that the company confirmed.
The generative AI pilot, which is separate from Carli, has helped Carvana to reduce headcount in the department by 1,400 people while reducing processing times.
‘Never something that we considered’
Many investors are back on the Carvana bandwagon after the company managed through the last two years, but some concerns remain.
The Garcia family and its control of the company have been a target of some investors, including a lawsuit last year brought by two large North American pension funds that invested in Carvana alleging the Garcias ran a “pump-and-dump” scheme to enrich themselves. Its one of several lawsuits that have been brought against the the father-son duo in recent years, largely involving the family’s businesses.
In general, CEO Garcia said he attempts to use criticism as motivation in his “march” to lead Carvana, invoking a phrase he has regularly ended investor calls with for several years: “The march continues.”
Family ties
Carvana went public three years after spinning off from a Garcia-owned company called DriveTime, a private company owned by the elder Garcia, who remains the controlling shareholder of Carvana. DriveTime was formerly a bankrupt rental-car business known as Ugly Duckling that Garcia II, who pled guilty to bank fraud in 1990 in connection to Charles Keating’s Lincoln Savings & Loan scandal, grew into a dealership network.
Carvana has separated itself from the company but still shares many processes with DriveTime. The close link between Caravan and other Garcia-owned or -controlled companies has given some investors pause.
The Wall Street Journal in December 2021 detailed a network of Garcia companies that do business with DriveTime, Carvana or both.
Most notably, Carvana still relies on servicing and collections on automotive vehicle financing and shares revenues generated by the loans. The businesses also, at times, sell vehicles to one another and Carvana leases several facilities from DriveTime in addition to profit-sharing agreements.
For example, during 2022, 2021, and 2020, Carvana recognized $176 million, $186 million and $94 million, respectively, of commissions earned on vehicle service contracts, or VSC, also known as warranties, sold to its customers and administered by DriveTime.
Carvana sells such warranties or other service-related protections to customers, and DriveTime takes them over, giving Carvana a commission. It’s one of several multimillion-dollar transactions between the family-controlled companies.
The younger Garcia, who started Carvana while serving as treasurer at DriveTime, says completely separating from Drivetime is not a main priority at this time, as it utilizes already established systems such as the financing and servicing that aren’t core to Carvana’s operations.
Carvana’s march hasn’t always been in a straight line: The company was a darling stock of the coronavirus pandemic, as it was lightyears ahead of traditional auto retailers in selling vehicles online – a process that surged during the global health crisis and, in some states, became the only way businesses could operate due to stay-at-home orders.
But it couldn’t keep up with demand, pushing Carvana to invest billions in growth opportunities, including an acquisition of used car auction business ADESA.
Then the used vehicle market shifted and Carvana’s aggressive growth plans — which included buying thousands of vehicles from auctions and consumers at hefty premiums compared to traditional auto dealers to build inventory — became a major liability when prices declined.
Carvana’s debt grew, including the debt-funded ADESA deal, and its stock became the most shorted in the country as fears of bankruptcy and a creditor fight grew. The stock lost nearly all of its value in 2022, causing some to speculate bankruptcy may be ahead.
Garcia is adamant that he never believed bankruptcy would happen, saying “absolutely not” when asked about it. His confidence was fueled by a belief that the service Carvana offers – selling and buying used vehicles online and streamlining the tedious process of car purchasing is something consumers need and want.
He also said taking the company private – which scared some stakeholders and investors – was never a viable option: “I would say it was a thought in the sense that other people thought about it. It was never something that we considered,” Garcia said.
The inside of a Carvana sign vending machine in Tempe, Ariz.
Michael Wayland / CNBC
But Carvana’s debt load is still very much a factor.
A deal between Carvana and a group of investors who collectively owned $5.2 billion of its outstanding unsecured bonds reduced the used car retailer’s total debt outstanding by more than $1.2 billion but also kicked much of the debt to later this decade, at largely higher interest rates.
Marc Spizzirri, a senior managing director of B. Riley Advisory Services, said every restructuring is unique but in general companies need to take action quickly after taking on debt to ensure they don’t land in the same circumstances that drove the debt in the first place.
“They have to be able to service that debt,” said Spizzirri, a former franchised dealer. “It’s a classic pre-bankruptcy process and in [many companies’] minds that’s not an option for them … But they can’t keep repeating what they’ve done before.”
Carvana’s new notes will mature in 2028; the old notes, which carry interest rates ranging from just under 5% to more than 10%, are due between 2025 and 2030. The old and new notes make up roughly 78% of Carvana’s nearly $6 billion total debt.
For now, the march continues for Carvana.