Many have already pronounced the death of NFTs, and in part, they are correct. Amidst the fervor of the NFT hype cycle, we saw huge valuations and sales such as Beeple’s ‘The 5000 Days’ collection selling for a staggering $69.3 million. However, not substantiated by anything beyond the hype, the market came crashing down with […]
Source link
left
You Might Only Have 2 Years Left to Take Advantage of This Unprecedented Retirement Savings Opportunity
For the past six years, savvy retirement planners have benefited from an incredible opportunity to boost their long-term savings, but that opportunity may be closing at the end of 2025.
One of the biggest drags on retirement savings is taxes. If you want to minimize taxes, it pays to plan well in advance of when you’ll need your retirement savings. And one of the best ways to mitigate your tax burden in retirement is with the strategic use of Roth accounts.
For the next two years, it’s still possible to take advantage of Roth accounts in a very specific way that can help your retirement savings go further when you retire. That door will close if Congress doesn’t extend the current tax rules beyond 2025.
Here’s what you need to know.

Image source: Getty Images.
The changing landscape
In 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. One of the big focuses of the act, as the name implies, is lowering the income tax rates and simplifying the income tax return process for many Americans.
Those rules are set to expire at the end of 2025 when the tax law will revert to the rules in use previously. Here are the tax brackets for 2024.
Current Tax Rate | Individual Filer AGI | Joint Filer AGI |
---|---|---|
10% | $11,600 or less | $23,200 or less |
12% | $11,601 to $47,150 | $23,201 to $94,300 |
22% | $47,151 to $100,525 | $94,301 to $201,050 |
24% | $100,526 to $191,950 | $201,051 to $383,900 |
32% | $100,951 to $243,725 | $383,901 to $487,450 |
35% | $243,726 to $609,350 | $487,451 to $731,200 |
37% | $609,351 or more | $731,201 or more |
Data source: IRS.
Some of the most notable changes for retirement planning come from the 12%, 22%, and 24% tax brackets. If the tax laws aren’t extended, we’ll see those rates move to approximately 15%, 25%, and 28%. Married couples could see income that would currently fall in the 24% tax bracket climb into the 33% tax bracket in 2026.
As such, the ability to lock in current tax rates is very appealing.
Use a Roth account to lock in tax rates
Current retirees or near-retirees can take advantage of the current tax rates through the use of a strategy called a Roth conversion.
A Roth conversion is when you take savings from a traditional retirement account and convert them into a Roth retirement account. When you do so, you’ll pay taxes on the entire amount you convert based on the current tax rates. But when you go to withdraw funds, you won’t owe any additional taxes.
A Roth conversion won’t make sense for everyone, but for individuals or couples that are sitting in the 12% to 24% tax brackets, it could save them a whole lot of money in taxes over the long run.
It’s most advantageous to use the Roth conversion when you can keep your other income low. So if you don’t have any capital gains to report and haven’t started collecting Social Security, now is the most opportune time to use the strategy.
What’s more, Roth conversions could be even more advantageous down the road for a couple of reasons related to your taxes in retirement. First, converting funds from a traditional retirement account to a Roth will reduce your future required minimum distributions. Second, Roth retirement account withdrawals don’t count toward your adjusted gross income, which could impact the taxes you pay on Social Security and capital gains.
Everyone’s situation is different, and what makes sense for one person might not make sense for another. It’s best to consult a professional about the potential to save on your taxes with strategic Roth conversions if you think you might be able to take advantage of the strategy. Their fee could be well worth it if it saves you thousands in taxes over the long run.
There’s no telling what Congress will do in the future. What we do know is the current law is set to expire before 2026, and there’s no indication of its renewal anytime soon. With two years to prepare, it’s worth exploring the potential benefits Roth conversions could have on your retirement finances.
My cousin left his estate to 6 cousins, but only one received his inheritance
I appreciate and learn from your column, and read it religiously. Several of your recent readers have asked you questions about wills or what happens when someone dies without a will. I would like to add my experience to the scenarios you have already addressed in recent months, as it adds to your discussion of the consequences of avoiding proper estate planning.
A court appointed attorney once called to inform me that my mother’s cousin died without a will. The deceased had no children, spouse or siblings. The estate was being divided on the basis of closest kin, which, in this case it was the deceased person’s six cousins.
An attorney contacted me. He was tracking down distant relatives of the deceased, because most of the six cousins were no longer living. In fact, only one cousin outlived the deceased person. The offspring of each deceased cousin were collectively awarded a share equal to 1/6 of the deceased’s estate minus court and attorney fees.
Therefore, after about a year from the onset of this person’s death, my siblings and I each received an inheritance of about $9,000. The one cousin who was still alive at the time was legally entitled to 1/6 of the estate, close to $60,000. The law does not take into account whether a potential heir deserves, or needs the inheritance, but rather uses subjective formulas, as anyone would expect.
Court documents
This makes sense, but I can’t help but feel that the deceased cousin would not have wanted the bulk of their estate to be awarded to this extremely wealthy cousin who was advanced in age and had a personal estate worth over $30 million. This person received the largest share of the deceased’s estate.
After the probate process ended, I requested a copy of the court papers to learn more about my distant relatives. That’s when I got an unexpected surprise: The court papers included a document labeled “last will and testament” signed by an attorney and by the deceased person, leaving their entire estate to my siblings and I, as our mother was the cousin with whom the deceased had been closest to.
When I asked the attorneys why they told me there had been no will, they pointed out that the will lacked a witness signature. My mother‘s cousin had wishes, expressed those wishes in writing, signed the written will in front of an attorney, but did not have the signature witnessed.
As I learned through this experience a signed will is not legally a “will” even if it is prepared by an attorney, and labeled last will and testament, unless it is also witnessed. Perhaps this is true only in our state but it was a shocking lesson.
I hope that individuals who think their handwritten signed notes will be sufficient think again, as you have so often cautioned. The cost of an attorney’s fee to prepare an official will is well worth the peace of mind it provides.
Yes I’d rather my hard earned savings go to people and causes that matter to me, and not to distant relatives who are so financially secure that they would not benefit from inheriting a portion of my estate. Preparing a will or trust allows us one final chance to make a difference for others. Personally, I’d like to get that right as my final act.
What is your take?
Glad to Have A Legal Will

“If a person with millions of dollars can make such a mistake, who’s to say others forget the importance of their John Hancock?”
MarketWatch illustration
Dear Glad,
Your story is both alarming and, I suspect, not that uncommon.
A trust and estate attorney once told me that she prepared the will of an extremely wealthy man, and when she visited his office, he showed it to her and where he kept it. He was happy with all of the time they had spent putting it together, and was glad he had finally divided his estate in a manner that he believed was fair and equitable, and reflected his wishes, charitable interests, and his relationship with his closest friends and relatives. There was just one problem: It was still in a sealed envelope where, he believed, it was safe. She pointed out the obvious and easy mistake, “You haven’t signed it.” If a person with millions of dollars can make such a mistake, who’s to say others forget the importance of their John Hancock?
You’re correct that the legal framework that determines whether a will is valid varies by state. In New Jersey, for instance, “A will must be signed by the deceased or by someone who had the authority to sign for the maker of the will,” according to Bratton Estate & Elder Care Attorneys. “The will must also be signed by at least two other witnesses. In order for the signature of these witnesses to be valid, the signees should add their signatures to the document as soon as possible. New Jersey will accept handwritten wills whether or not they are witnessed, provided that it can be clearly shown that the document was intended to be the deceased’s will. The document should also be clearly identifiable as written in the deceased’s own handwriting.”
Believe it or not, some people still wish to write their wills by hand, but holographic or handwritten wills are only legal in about half of the states in the U.S., including California. Whether it’s written or typed, always write your will under the guidance of a trust and estate attorney. Word of warning: It’s not worth writing a will on the cheap or downloading one from the Internet. Too many things can go wrong. Sometimes, people leave possessions that no longer exist. (That Rolls Royce? He sold it to pay the taxes on his home.) Or they leave their entire fortune to one lucky cousin and five more show up to claim their share of the estate. (“I leave my entire estate to my cousin, John Murphy.” Is there more than one cousin named John Murphy or, worse, some people have neglected to name the person entirely.)
Online wills are often free or low-cost, but may have inadequate language. Words matter. “If a will states that property should pass to a man’s ‘surviving wife and children,’ what happens if the man had two ex-wives and several children from other marriages?” asks the law firm Landskin and Ricaforte. “On the other hand, suppose the same man had three daughters and left ‘equal shares of the estate to my descendants.’ The will was made when his children were teenagers, but two of them had a child of their own at his death. The term ‘descendants’ includes children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, making it possible for his children and grandchildren to receive a fifth of the estate — even though he intended to give a third to each daughter.”
It also may be that the terms of a will deserve to be overturned. You can, for instance, typically contest a will or trust on the following grounds: lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence from a family member, and improper execution, which is exactly what happened to your distant cousin’s will. If he had signed his own will, his estate would have been distributed according to his wishes, and you would likely be in a more comfortable financial situation. I have received too many letters about relatives or “new friends” or even caregivers who isolate elderly people, put themselves on their bank accounts as co-signers or co-owners, and coerce the person to write a new will.
The biggest mistake many people make is that they don’t write a will, and leave no estate plan at all. Less than half of Americans have made a will, although three quarters of people 65 and over have made one, according to a 2021 survey by Gallup. Just 20% of adults under age 30 have a will. “Upper-income Americans are much more likely than lower-income Americans to report having a will,” Gallup said. College graduates and white Americans are also more likely to have a will. After building a lifetime of wealth, regardless of whether it’s $500,000 or $5 million, it is a shame to leave it up to state laws to decide how it’s distributed.
You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.
The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.
Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell:
My wife received a $1 million payout from her employer when she retired. Am I entitled to 50% of that if we divorce?
I’m a 61-year-old single librarian and ‘proud’ Democrat from Maine. Should I move to Florida like Jeff Bezos?
I cosigned my boyfriend’s mortgage, but I’m not on the deed. I didn’t want to marry again after a costly divorce. How do I protect myself?
Investment products in the crypto arena have recently reported net inflows of $21 million, breaking a persistent six-week drought. With the crypto market’s future continuously debated among experts, such inflows mark a possible resurgence of confidence among investors.
The top cryptocurrency remained at the forefront of this resurgence, capturing most of the inflow. But as Bitcoin continues its dominance, emerging coins like Solana also signify the diversifying landscape of the crypto world. Amid these positive indicators, the Ethereum token, however, tells a different story.
Bitcoin And Solana Shine, Ethereum Faces The Heat
Leading the pack, Bitcoin funds reported an inflow of roughly $20.4 million in the past week. In sharp contrast, investment products betting on Bitcoin’s decline witnessed an outflow of $1.5 million, suggesting a significant retreat from negative market sentiments.
James Butterfill, CoinShares’ Head of Research, pointed out the sustained relinquishment of short positions on Bitcoin, indicating a potential bullish sentiment for the top crypto.
Solana, a rising star in the crypto ecosystem, continued to impress. Reporting inflows for the 27th week this year, it added $5.1 million to its coffers, reiterating its strong market position.
Butterfill acclaimed Solana’s consistent performance, noting, “Solana continues to shine,” emphasizing its resilience in a year that has seen numerous altcoins fluctuate.

On the flip side, Ethereum products haven’t mirrored this positive trend. Despite being one of the leading cryptocurrencies, it registered outflows for the seventh week. Butterfill labeled Ethereum as the current “least loved” altcoin.
Global Reactions And Influencing Factors On Crypto
Geographical dissections of the inflow trends offer noteworthy insights. While Europe and Canada embraced the crypto resurgence with inflows of $23 million and $17 million, respectively, the US displayed contrasting sentiments, pulling out $19 million.
Butterfill links this unexpected inflow towards the week’s end to a blend of positive price momentum, apprehensions regarding US government debt prices, and the recent impasse over governmental funding.
However, Butterfill also highlighted the low trading volumes across the investment product and crypto markets.
Amid these crypto currents, blockchain equities failed to catch the same wind, seeing outflows totaling $8.4 million. This trend mirrors the broader tech sector’s direction, which also leaned towards a sell-off, as pointed out by Butterfill.
Notably, the fund flows in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana appear reflected even in their prices. While Bitcoin and Solana have spiked over the past day, recording a 3.3% and 6.2% upward trajectory, Ethereum has only seen a slight upward move of just 0.5% over the same period.
Featured image from iStock, Chart from TradingView
What to do with ESPN?
That question hangs over Walt Disney Co. as it prepares to report fiscal third-quarter results on Wednesday.
Like a multibillion-dollar albatross, the cable sports network has devolved from cash cow to cord-cutting victim as more people cancel their cable subscriptions and the costs of sports-broadcasting rights rise. Last month, Disney
DIS,
Chief Executive Robert Iger said ESPN was seeking a strategic partner and was open to selling an equity stake. The network, which is owned by Disney and led by Jimmy Pitaro, has talked to Major League Baseball, the National Football League, the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League.
ESPN headlines several near-term headaches for what has recently been a not-so-magic kingdom. Already grappling with writers’ and actors’ strikes that have paralyzed production in Hollywood, Disney has also stumbled through recent high-profile box-office misses — among them “The Little Mermaid” and “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” — the loss of streaming subscribers over the past two quarters and a steep decline in linear-TV advertising that is roiling the industry. Throw in a political standoff with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and you have a five-alarm corporate fire.
“We are increasingly worried about advertising trends. Given viewership trends
remain highly negative, declining around 10% [year over year] on average, this clearly bodes very poorly for forthcoming advertising revenues,” Atlantic Equities analyst Hamilton Faber said in a note last month, in which he slashed his Disney price target to $76 from $113.
Disney’s stock has tumbled 22% to $86.28 over the past six months.
In trimming his price target 9% to $94 and downgrading Disney shares to neutral, Tim Nollen, Macquarie’s senior media tech analyst, sees “too many near-term issues” such as weak TV ad sales, direct-to-consumer declines, softening parks trends and the Hollywood strikes. The July 4 weekend was the slowest at Walt Disney World in nearly a decade, the Wall Street Journal reported.
“Disney’s cost cuts may help protect earnings, but these top-line issues are concerning,” Nollen wrote.
The company’s direct-to-consumer segment, which includes Disney+, is of particular concern. It lost $1.7 billion in fiscal 2021 and more than $4 billion in fiscal 2022, and it is expected to lose nearly $3 billion this year, according to Gimme Credit analyst Dave Novosel. Disney finds itself in a dogfight with Netflix Inc.
NFLX,
Apple Inc.
AAPL,
Amazon.com Inc.
AMZN,
Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
WBD,
Comcast Corp.
CMCSA,
and others.
Disney’s future is inexorably linked to Iger, who recently agreed to a two-year contract extension through 2026. Iger’s restructuring plan to slash $5.5 billion in costs — including 7,000 layoffs — and his deep institutional knowledge of Disney gives analysts hope that things will turn around. He told CNBC he was open to selling Disney’s ABC broadcast stations, FX and National Geographic.
“Iger staying until late 2026 gives investors higher signal quality regarding [Disney’s] path for the next 3.5 years, a reasonable investment time frame,” Needham analyst Laura Martin said in a note in mid-July.
The bull market has left these 20 stocks behind, but they are primed for growth
We’re in an eight-month-old bull market. From Oct. 12 through June 12, the S&P 500 has risen 21.3%, excluding dividends. But a stock screen identifies 20 companies that have been left behind, even though analysts expect their revenues to soar through 2025.
First, let’s take a closer look at the new bull market. Here are price changes and forward price-to-earnings valuations for the 11 sectors of the S&P 500
SPX,
followed by numbers for the full index:
S&P 500 sector | Price change – Oct. 12 through June 12 | 2022 price change | Price change since the end of 2021 | Forward P/E | Forward P/E – Dec. 31, 2021 |
Information Technology | 46.5% | -28.9% | -2.1% | 26.2 | 28.1 |
Communication Services | 33.5% | -31.3% | -19.6% | 17.1 | 20.9 |
Industrials | 21.2% | -13.5% | -2.8% | 18.3 | 21.4 |
Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | -37.2% | -20.5% | 26.8 | 34.2 |
Materials | 15.4% | -5.0% | -12.6% | 16.6 | 16.6 |
Financials | 9.2% | -19.8% | -15.5% | 12.9 | 16.1 |
Real Estate | 8.9% | -32.4% | -28.5% | 17.0 | 25.3 |
Consumer Staples | 8.3% | -4.0% | -5.2% | 19.8 | 21.4 |
Healthcare | 7.1% | 2.4% | -7.4% | 17.1 | 17.2 |
Utilities | 7.1% | -7.8% | -8.1% | 17.1 | 20.4 |
Energy | -0.2% | -11.2% | 45.4% | 10.6 | 11.1 |
S&P 500 | 21.3% | -21.9% | -9.0% | 18.7 | 21.5 |
Source: FactSet |
Three of the top-performing sectors in the new bull market were among the hardest-hit last year. This has been a tech-driven rally. Keep in mind that the benchmark index is weighted by market capitalization. Its concentration in the largest five companies has risen to a record level, according to analysts at Ned Davis Research.
And despite all of them being known as technology innovators, those five companies are actually spread across three sectors. Here they are, with their portfolio percentages within the $408 billion SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
SPY,
which tracks the benchmark index. We have also included their expected two-year compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for revenue through calendar 2025. This means, for example, that Nvidia Corp.’s
NVDA,
surprise guidance for a 50% sequential increase in sales during the current quarter is already baked into its baseline 2023 number.
Company | Ticker | Sector | % of SPY Portfolio | Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025 | Price change – Oct. 12 through June 12 | Price change since end of 2021 |
Apple Inc. |
AAPL, |
Information Technology | 7.46% | 6.8% | 41% | 4% |
Microsoft Corp. |
MSFT, |
Information Technology | 6.74% | 12.7% | 38% | -1% |
Amazon.com Inc. |
AMZN, |
Consumer Discretionary | 3.05% | 12.0% | 51% | -24% |
Nvidia Corp. |
NVDA, |
Information Technology | 2.64% | 25.4% | 170% | 34% |
Alphabet Inc. Class A |
GOOGL, |
Communication Services | 2.02% | 11.1% | 40% | -15% |
Alphabet Inc. Class C |
GOOGL, |
Communication Services | 1.77% | 11.1% | 40% | -14% |
Source: FactSet |
Click on the tickers for more about each company, index or exchange-traded fund.
Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.
Screening the S&P 500 for those left behind
Starting with the S&P 500, we cut the list down to the 232 companies whose stocks have declined during the eight-month bull market from Oct. 12 through June 12.
Then we looked at estimated revenue numbers among analysts polled by FactSet for calendar 2023, 2024 and 2025. We looked at calendar-year rather than fiscal-year estimates, because about 20% of the S&P 500 have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar. Sales estimates for 2025 weren’t available for eight of the companies.
Among the remaining 226, here are the 20 expected to show the highest two-year CAGR for revenue through 2025:
Company | Ticker | Industry | Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2025 | Price change – Oct. 12 through June 12 | Price change since end of 2021 |
Enphase Energy Inc. |
ENPH, |
Semiconductors | 24.7% | -33% | -3% |
Insulet Corp. |
PODD, |
Medical Specialties | 18.8% | -3% | 7% |
ONEOK Inc. |
OKE, |
Oil and Gas Pipelines | 14.8% | -9% | 2% |
Targa Resources Corp. |
TRGP, |
Gas Distributors | 14.4% | -5% | 34% |
Cigna Group |
CI, |
Managed Healthcare | 13.9% | -19% | 16% |
EPAM Systems Inc. |
EPAM, |
Information Technology Services | 13.7% | -33% | -67% |
Hess Corp. |
HES, |
Integrated Oil | 13.5% | -5% | 82% |
Charles Schwab Corp. |
SCHW, |
Investment Banks/ Brokers | 13.1% | -35% | -36% |
Bio-Techne Corp. |
TECH, |
Biotechnology | 12.9% | -5% | -39% |
Incyte Corp. |
INCY, |
Pharmaceuticals | 12.5% | -23% | -15% |
Match Group Inc. |
MTCH, |
Internet Software/ Services | 11.7% | -1% | -69% |
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. |
MKTX, |
Investment Banks/ Brokers | 11.3% | -3% | -34% |
Starbucks Corp. |
SBUX, |
Restaurants | 11.2% | -1% | -16% |
Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. Class A |
EL, |
Household/ Personal Care | 10.9% | -28% | -51% |
Etsy Inc. |
ETSY, |
Internet Retail | 10.8% | -24% | -59% |
Schlumberger Ltd. |
SLB, |
Contract Drilling | 10.7% | -12% | 57% |
BlackRock Inc. |
BLK, |
Investment Managers | 10.3% | -4% | -25% |
Molina Healthcare Inc. |
MOH, |
Managed Healthcare | 9.8% | -13% | -9% |
Revvity Inc. |
RVTY, |
Medical Specialties | 9.8% | -19% | -44% |
Charles River Laboratories International Inc. |
CRL, |
Commercial Services | 9.4% | -6% | -45% |
Source: FactSet |
Looking out to 2025 might seem to be quite a stretch for traders reacting to financial news day to day. But some of these companies might be worth further research if you are looking to make a contrarian investment or two. You might be able to buy something at what might eventually turn out to have been a good price, ahead of a period during which year-over-year revenue comparisons will set up a more positive view among a larger number of investors.
Don’t miss: Bank of America execs blew $93.6 billion. Here’s how they did it.