
“I have taken care of his first child from another marriage for 12 years.”
Source link
paid
My mom refuses to move out of my house. She paid for upkeep and appliances.
I live in Florida and bought a house in 2011. My mother moved in about a year later. We never discussed if this was permanent or not, but after a few years I started thinking about living on my own again. However, she refuses to move out. She has invested money in repairs and new appliances and also covers groceries and cooks — even after I have asked her not to pay for anything.
So when I asked her to move out, she brought up all the money she has invested and said that she would either take everything she ever bought with her or I would have to pay her back, and that was the end of the conversation. I am now in a relationship that is getting serious. We have talked about moving in together. But my boyfriend is furious with how my mom treats me and how she’s obsessed with fixing up my house.
I am trying to pay off my house and am also thinking of having her continue living there and renting out the other room. My boyfriend suggests that he and I move into his apartment together, meaning that I could sell my house, and my mother would move out on her own. But my mother is getting old, and even though she stresses me out, I feel bad asking her to move out.
I don’t like the idea of selling my house, in case things don’t work out with my boyfriend. He insists that he would pay for a new home for us so I wouldn’t have to use the money I make from selling my own house. Instead, the money I make from selling would go toward my retirement. But he also thinks selling would take stress off me, because if my mother stays in my house and I rent out the other room, she will be calling me all the time.
My boyfriend thinks that even after paying off my house, it would still take a while before I see a profit if I rent it out, and that I would gain more money and experience less stress in the long term if I sell before the housing market tanks. If I do sell my house, my mother wants her share of what she has spent on the house. His idea is tempting.
He says that in a relationship we all have to make sacrifices, but I feel like mine would be bigger, and I would like some time to think before selling. Any ideas or options?
Undecided
“You appear to be the one making all the sacrifices.”
MarketWatch illustration
Dear Undecided,
You appear to be the one making all the sacrifices.
Don’t sell your home, and attend to one thing at a time. You’re also dealing with two separate issues: living in a house with your mom (a situation that you wish to change) and not living with your boyfriend (a situation he wishes to change). You have control over both, but attend to the former first. She is your mother, after all, and resolving this situation amicably should be your first priority.
You have filial and financial ties with your mother, and you feel beholden to your boyfriend because you presumably care for him and want to make the relationship work. But you can’t be all things to all people, because sooner or later, you will find you’ve put everyone else first and become a bit-part player in the story of your own life. So the first action is to decide what you need.
Telling people what you need is the first step to being the architect of your own life: “I need to live alone at this point in my life.” Or, “I need to hold on to my house instead of selling it, as it’s my sanctuary and an investment in my future.” Even if other people don’t listen or respect your needs — be they friends, boyfriends or family members — you need to respect your own needs and act accordingly.
Regarding the ethics of evicting your mother from your home — that is something for you to decide. She contributed financially toward the upkeep of your property, but that does not give her the right to live there ad infinitum. The legal issues governing the eviction of a family member without a lease agreement vary from state to state. You could ask her to sign a lease agreement, of course, thereby formalizing your arrangement.
Legal rules vary by state
In Florida, in order to evict a person with no lease agreement, you would file a suit called an unlawful detainer action with the county court. Unlike with an eviction, with this action a “homeowner does not have to give notice to the family member or individual that they are trying to remove,” according to the law office of Brian Kowal. “This is because there is no landlord/tenant relationship. Once you file the unlawful detainer, they have five days to respond.”
Other states have similar laws. “New York Courts have held that where family members (non-owners) live at a property with the consent of the owner, they cannot be evicted in a summary proceeding,” according to the New York law firm Weiss & Weiss. “Instead, an ejectment action must be brought in the Supreme Court of the county in which the premises are located.”
It continues: “An action in ejectment is brought in the same manner as a regular lawsuit, where the party is served with a summons and complaint, and then has between 20 and 30 days to file an answer, depending on the method of service. After answering, the defendant would have the opportunity to defend the action, obtain full discovery, and have a trial, if the action is not decided by motion.”
Of course, these are extreme actions, and you sound conflicted. It’s time to have a frank talk with your mother about both your futures. You first need to figure out what you want to happen. You could rent out your home and she could act as a de facto live-in landlady, or you could both look for alternative accommodation for your mother, or you could put a time frame on when you would like to make changes.
Take action based on what you believe is right, and not on what your boyfriend thinks is a good idea — which may simply be a good idea for him. The best way to decide whether to continue or change your living arrangements with your mother is to look at her alternatives, based on her income and savings. If you work together and give yourselves a generous timeline, I feel confident that you can work this out.
You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.
The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.
Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell:
My wife received a $1 million payout from her employer when she retired. Am I entitled to 50% of that if we divorce?
I’m a 61-year-old single librarian and ‘proud’ Democrat from Maine. Should I move to Florida like Jeff Bezos?
I cosigned my boyfriend’s mortgage, but I’m not on the deed. I didn’t want to marry again after a costly divorce. How do I protect myself?
Hive Digital says BTC miners bought last Dec. have already paid themselves off

Bitcoin (BTC) miner Hive Digital Technologies says the move to acquire a fleet of Bitmain mining rigs in 2022 has already paid for itself, largely due to a significant increase in the price of BTC.
In a Dec. 8 statement, Hive Digital wrote that it had been acquiring mining rigs since the collapse of FTX, a decision it believes will put it in a favorable position for the upcoming Bitcoin halving, currently slated for April 2024.
276.3 Bitcoin produced from ASIC and GPU mining operations, representing an average of 66.7 Bitcoin Per Exahash
Produced an average of 9.2 BTC per day
Ended the month with 4.18 EH/s of mining capacity,… pic.twitter.com/4pWYah2NfD— HIVE Digital Technologies (@HIVEDigitalTech) December 7, 2023
Hive purchased 3,750 Bitmain S19J rigs on Dec. 22, 2022, with president and chief operating officer Aydin Kilic saying the team had also updated its software stack to accommodate the new rigs.
S19J mining rigs were the top-of-the-line ASIC rigs in 2022 but have since been succeeded by the S19Ks, which boast a lower energy consumption rating than their predecessors.
“Since the collapse of FTX in November 2022, which marked Bitcoin heading into a year-long bear market, HIVE has used the opportunity to acquire new generation ASICs at attractive $/TH prices.”
Overall, since the collapse of FTX, Hive Digital has purchased 29,000 ASICs, with two separate acquisitions of 9,800 Bitmain S19k Pro mining rigs announced on Nov. 14 and Dec. 4.
“The approximately 29,000 ASICs were purchased at an average price of approximately $13.70/TH,” wrote Hive Digital, describing the acquisition price as attractive, considering the rigs have an average output of 26 joules per terahash (J/TH).
Hive Digital said the recent acquisitions of mining rigs have seen its global fleet efficiency rise to 28.9 J/TH with an expected operating hash rate of 4.8 exahashes per second by the end of December 2023.
Related: Phoenix seals $380M deal with WhatsMiner for green Bitcoin mining
Additionally, Hive reported that it had produced 276.3 Bitcoin in November 2023 from ASICs and GPUs, representing an average of 66.7 Bitcoin per exahash.
Since Jan. 1, Bitcoin has grown more than 160%, resulting in a boon for miners, many of which struggled through a particularly difficult crypto winter spanning from the end of 2021 and running through all of 2022.
Bitcoin is currently changing hands for $43,400, up 9.8% in the last seven days, according to Cointelegraph price data.
X Hall of Flame: Expect ‘records broken’ by Bitcoin ETF: Brett Harrison (ex-FTX US)
My ex-husband paid the mortgage on our home for 20 years? Do I get half if he sells?
Dear Big Move,
We live in Minnesota.
Do I qualify for a split share of property after 20 years of not paying the mortgage?
My ex-husband was the only one making the payments, but both names are on the property and the deeds.
We bought the property in 2006, and each paid $20,000 towards the down payment. After two years, we refinanced the mortgage, and we each received $40,000 in 2008.
He recently defaulted on the homeowners association fees. They contacted me, and I started paying.
If we sell, do I get a share of the house?
Ex-wife
‘The Big Move’ is a MarketWatch column looking at the ins and outs of real estate, from navigating the search for a new home to applying for a mortgage.
Do you have a question about buying or selling a home? Do you want to know where your next move should be? Email Aarthi Swaminathan at TheBigMove@marketwatch.com.
Dear Ex-Wife,
Yes, you are legally entitled to half the share of that property, even if you did not pay a mortgage.
It may seem unfair to your ex-husband, but whether you paid or did not pay the mortgage does not impact your ownership under the law
In most cases, if your name is on the deed, you own one half the property. He can buy out your share, or you could even buy out his half if you want full ownership.
If you came to an arrangement amicably, a quitclaim deed would remove either spouse from a title, and change the property from joint ownership to sole ownership.
Alternatively, you could file a partition action with the court to force a sale, if you do not wish to continue paying the HOA fees.
It’s surprising that your divorce settlement did not settle this property’s ownership. Contact your divorce attorney and/or make sure that you didn’t miss anything that was stated about the division of property.
Unexpected financial consequences
For other married couples, your experience provides a cautionary tale as it shows the importance of a prenuptial agreement and — at the very least — making sure all of these loose ends are tied up at the time of the divorce.
A prenup is a written contract between a couple’s marriage or civil union that clearly sets out the ownership of assets. Crucially, this states what happens to those assets in the event of a divorce. This typically includes all assets — from cars and real estate to investment accounts and retirement funds.
If you have a prenup and get divorced, your assets and properties are divided according to the prenup, according to Rocket Mortgage. The company also adds that in “most cases, the prenup usually overrides state laws about property distribution.”
But always check with a lawyer first.
If the ownership of this house was not dealt with at the time of your divorce, your ex-husband will need to lawyer up.
By emailing your questions, you agree to having them published anonymously on MarketWatch. By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Company, the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.
I paid off $57,000 of my boyfriend’s mortgage. We married, but now he wants a divorce — and this property.
Dear Quentin,
I got myself into a real doozy of a situation.
I made $57,000 in loan payments on my then boyfriend and now husband’s house. He was going to let his place get foreclosed on, but since I had already spent quite a bit of money helping him out, I didn’t want that to happen. Our plan was for him to sign the house over to me and my son once his loan was paid in full. We also got married.
Well, you guessed it: I paid off the loan and now find myself in court because, all of a sudden, he has decided that now that his house is paid off in full, he no longer wants to be married to me — and he wants his place back! My attorney said that what I paid toward the loan is money I effectively gave him as a gift, but the rest is marital funds.
It now looks like the kindness I showed him in trying to help save his house and his credit rating — and to ensure that my son had his own home — is going to cost me $57,000, and all because of this jerk. What can I do to recover my lost funds? Is it true that he can walk away with his house in our divorce?
Feeling Like a Fool
Related: My husband, 76, and my daughter, 26, don’t get along. How do I make sure he doesn’t disinherit her if I die first?
“You spent a lot of money on a wing and a prayer — and your boyfriend’s promise.”
MarketWatch illustration
Dear Feeling,
You spent a lot of money on a wing and a prayer — and your boyfriend’s promise. But if you paid off the loan on this house using marital funds after you were married, the house would likely have gone from separate to marital property. That means you would now both own this house, 50/50.
Generally, anything purchased before a marriage is regarded as separate property, and anything accumulated during a marriage is deemed marital property.
If you paid all of this money during your courtship, before you were married, then you have found yourself in that old “he said, she said” debacle typical of a “Judge Judy” episode: “He says it was a gift! She says it was a loan!” In other words, it’s your word against his and, legally, it was a gift. You were giving him money with the understanding or promise that he would sign his home over to you. But what you say he said he would do does not constitute a legal contract.
Moreover, the deal was fishy to begin with. If the home was worth, say, $200,000 and you paid off the final $57,000, it does not seem reasonable that he would sign over the entire property to you simply because you saved him from foreclosure. The arrangement seems skewed in your favor and, although he said he would transfer ownership of this house, he is entitled to change his mind. If this transfer of ownership had occurred before you were married, you also would likely have had to pay gift tax on it.
For what it’s worth: The annual exclusion, or the amount you can give a third party without using your annual gift or estate-tax exemption, is $17,000 in 2023 for a single person or $34,000 for a married couple. If you give more than that, you have to file a gift-tax return with the Internal Revenue Service. The donor — your then boyfriend, in this case — would generally be responsible for paying the gift tax, which ranges from 18% to 40%. It is, as an example, 32% for a gift of between $150,001 and $250,000.
The good news for people giving large amounts of money and assets: The current lifetime estate-tax exemption is $12.92 million for individuals and $25.84 million for married couples.
This is a complicated and messy situation, but perhaps less of a “doozy” than you think.
You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.
The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.
Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell:
My wife received a $1 million payout from her employer when she retired. Am I entitled to 50% of that if we divorce?
I’m a 61-year-old single librarian and ‘proud’ Democrat from Maine. Should I move to Florida like Jeff Bezos?
I cosigned my boyfriend’s mortgage, but I’m not on the deed. I didn’t want to marry again after a costly divorce. How do I protect myself?
I’m in my 60s with almost $1 million. My home is paid off. I’d like to move but am afraid of the high prices elsewhere: ‘Will I be OK?’
Dear MarketWatch,
I’m in my early 60s, and I have a paid-off home, valued under $200,000, in a rust-belt city that I’d like to move out of. On the upside, I’ve saved $950,000, which is invested with an investment firm, in taxable accounts. The firm has a good record and serves as a fiduciary. I receive a small amount of alimony and will continue to receive it for the next eight years. I’m trying to live only on the alimony so that I can keep my money invested in the hopes that it will grow — although right now, it seems to be going nowhere.
I’m able to get discounted health insurance through the government marketplace. I have no children. I worry about my finances, particularly when I see the price of real estate in desirable areas where I’d have relatives nearby. I worked for many years in a high-education-required/low-wage-provided career (I know, I know … it seemed to make sense at the time). I’ll receive only about $20,000 a year from Social Security. I keep my costs low — no cable is no problem — but I’d love to travel at some point. Any advice for me?
Thank you,
Will I Be OK?
See: We’re in our 60s, have almost $3 million and want to buy a new home. Do we tap into our savings or take out a mortgage?
Dear reader,
It sounds like you’ve got your mind on the right track, so it will really just come down to crunching the numbers and finding something that fits your budget.
Trying to rely on your alimony alone so that the rest of your money can grow is a fantastic strategy. What would help even more, of course, is if you were to continue contributing to that account, or to another type of account. You didn’t mention if you’re already retired, but if you are, is there any work you could do, even part time, to help boost your savings? That could help you with your ultimate goals.
As for moving to a new place, it’s totally natural to be nervous about that, but the move itself should be possible, as long as you’re flexible. If your goal is to live closer to family members, first consider just how much closer you want to be. For example, do you want to be in a five-block radius? Or a 30-minute drive? The wider your net, the more options you’ll have, and thus the more possibilities for finding an affordable home.
This isn’t just about the price tag of the home, although that can vary even from block to block. Each town or neighborhood could come with different expenses, like taxes, homeowners-association fees, cost of living and so on.
I know you’re worried about the finances — and that’s totally justified — but what you really need is a financial plan. You’re in a great situation with your home paid off, manageable spending habits and so much money stashed away. If you create a solid financial plan, especially with the help of a qualified financial planner, you could absolutely make the move work.
When making this plan, you should be sure give yourself an extra cushion, such as an extra-large emergency savings account, so that you don’t have to tap too heavily into your investments should an unexpected expense arise. And as you look for a place to live, you should also make a list of every single potential expense you can possibly think of. Ask your loved ones who live in those communities to help you come up with that list.
Also see: ‘I will work until I die’: I’m 74, have little money saved and battle medical issues. ‘I want to retire so I can have a few years to enjoy life.’
Be extra cautious as you consider the home you will live in, too. If it’s a house, how old are the roof and boiler? What will you pay for snow removal or lawn care? And if it’s a co-op or condo, how often and by how much can maintenance fees go up? Does the board often tack on assessment fees for building projects, and how are those handled month to month?
Also think about whether there are the kinds of doctors and medical facilities you currently or may eventually need nearby, and whether they’re in network. And what are the options for entertainment and staying active, and how much do those cost — things like a community center, fitness club, pool, golf course, etc.
It sounds like what you truly need is a plan that incorporates all of the money you have coming in and going out — that is, a rough budget you can adhere to every month that takes into account what the cost of everything could be, along with a hefty liquid reserve, just in case. With all of that, you may not feel quite as nervous. I wish you the best!
Readers: Do you have suggestions for this reader? Add them in the comments below.
Have a question about your own retirement savings? Email us at HelpMeRetire@marketwatch.com
CEO paid more than Apple’s Tim Cook last year—and Harvard Law’s youngest-ever graduate—unexpectedly leaves his $110 million gig
Kiwi Camara, the chief executive of legal tech firm CS Disco, turned heads earlier this year when data highlighted him as one of just nine CEOs to get a bigger paycheck than Apple’s Tim Cook last year.
Camara’s compensation totaled $110 million last year, compared to Cook’s $99 million, according to the Wall Street Journal in July, citing data from analytics company C-Suite Comp. In the company’s rankings, Camara came in just below Pinterest CEO Bill Ready (who received $123 million in pay), while Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman topped the list with a $253 million paycheck.
But the bumper pay wasn’t enough for Camara to stay in the role.
On Monday, CS Disco revealed in a stock filing that Camara was stepping down as CEO, with immediate effect. The filing gave few details of the circumstances of Camara’s exit, only saying that it was not due to “any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.”
Yet much of Camara’s sizable paycheck may not come to fruition, given the terms of his exit. Almost all of Camara’s compensation came in the form of stock options, which would normally only vest when the company’s stock passed certain thresholds, the lowest being $150, according to the Wall Street Journal. CS Disco’s shares have not even reached half that level since it started trading in 2021.
Shares in CS Disco have fallen by over 26% since Monday, when the company disclosed that Camara was leaving the company. The company now has a market capitalization of just $422 million. CS Disco’s shares are now almost 90% below their peak of $65.88 in September 2021.
CS Disco did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Founded in 2013, CS Disco provides technologies like artificial intelligence to law firms, thus saving time on tasks like legal discovery.
On Monday, CS Disco appointed board member Scott Hill as its interim CEO. Hill previously served as CFO and special advisor to the CEO of Intercontinental Exchange. Hill will be paid a salary of $50,000 and restricted stock options of around 32,000 shares (worth about $225,000 at Thursday’s closing price).
CS Disco reported $34.3 million in revenue for the quarter ending June 30, 2023, a rise of 2% year-on-year. It also narrowed losses to $14.9 million, compared to $20.2 million a year earlier. The company has never reported a profit since it went public.
Kiwi Camara’s career
Camara has had a prominent and, at times, controversial career. He’s the youngest-ever graduate of Harvard Law School, getting his degree at the age of 19. Yet his schooling was marked by a scandal when, at the age of 16, he shared class notes that included a racial slur. Camara apologized for the mistake, yet thinks the resulting controversy denied him opportunities at major law firms.
Camara then set up a firm with his Law School classmate Joe Sibley. The two gained prominence again in one of the earliest cases of file-sharing: The two defended Jammie Thomas-Rassett after record companies sued her in 2006 for downloading and sharing 24 songs on the platform Kazaa. Thomas-Rassett was, as one point, liable for $1.92 million in damages, which was eventually whittled down to $222,000 by 2013, seven years after the suit was first filed.
Camara’s former law partner now thinks he’ll be taking a break after his time leading CS Disco. “He just had so much on his plate with work that it was very difficult for him to find any leisure time,” Sibley told the Wall Street Journal.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
More from Fortune:
5 side hustles where you may earn over $20,000 per year—all while working from home
Want more for your money? These 14 savings accounts have rates of 5% APY (and higher)
Buying a house? Here’s how much to save
This is how much money you need to earn annually to comfortably buy a $600,000 home
Koron | Moment | Getty Images
Samantha Costanza went on a first date with a man she’d met on a dating app in January 2022.
They got to know each other as they both sipped on hot cider because of the cold at the Brooklyn, New York, bar where they’d agreed to meet. When it was time to pay for the drinks, Costanza’s date handed his credit card to the bartender.
A few days later, he messaged that he’d like to see her again. Costanza didn’t feel the same.
“I spent over an hour crafting a very polite reply that assured him I had a lovely time but just did not see a future connection,” said Costanza, 29, a customer operations analyst.
In response, the man asked Costanza if she could Venmo him back payment for her drinks.
More from Personal Finance:
Americans think they need nearly $1.3 million for retirement
Why Americans are struggling with car loans
Most parents spend 20% or more of income on child care
“I was in complete shock,” she said. “It made it seem like the only reason he would offer to pay for my drinks was that he expected something from me.”
Relationship and etiquette experts say the confluence of changing gender norms, popularity of payment apps and the economic climate tightening people’s budgets is making the already fraught first date a little more tense.
One symptom may be more awkwardness around how the tab is handled, in the moment and after the fact. Like Costanza, some women say they’ve had a male date ask for his money back after they explained they didn’t want to go out again.
“We are culturally moving into a dating environment that we’re all unfamiliar in,” said New York-based psychotherapist Carli Blau.
Toxic behaviors in online dating apps
The requests for money back after a disappointing date are a symptom of a much bigger problem with modern dating, said Jon Birger, author of “Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game.”
These situations would be much less likely to occur on a first date involving two people set up by a mutual friend or a family member, he said.
“It’s a byproduct of the awfulness and toxicity of online dating, where every first date is a blind date with a complete stranger,” Birger said. “There’s zero social accountability, which makes it easier for people to behave badly.”
Dating coach Blaine Anderson said a money request after a date is among the biggest taboos.
“Venmo-requesting a woman to split your first date if she doesn’t agree to a second date is pathetic and unethical,” Anderson said.

When men, in particular, ask for their money back, it can underscore the uncomfortable feeling women can get that their covered dinner came with expectations.
“The man considered the cost of that first date an investment, and that investment did not pan out,” said dating app expert Irina Manta, co-host of the podcast Strangers on the Internet.
Erin, a single 40-something in Pennsylvania who asked to use her first name only, felt unsettled when her date later asked for a refund.
After their first dinner together, she knew she wasn’t going to see him again because of his political views. When their check came, she offered to pay her portion but he insisted on covering the full bill.
But then, the next day, when she explained that she didn’t want to see him again, he asked her to Venmo him $30.
There’s zero social accountability, which makes it easier for people to behave badly.
“It really did feel very off-putting,” said Erin. “It really underscores some kind of sense of entitlement on his part.”
Although many find the expectation that men pay for the first tab old-fashioned, others see it as a kind gesture or a way to show interest.
Costanza said she would have been a bit put off if her date hadn’t at least offered to pay.
“Each drink cost $10, so a total of $20 to cover me on a first date seemed like an expected and polite gesture to show his interest,” she said.
How the economy is taking a toll
On the other hand, it’s important to consider the economy as a backdrop, said psychotherapist Blau.
Wage stagnation and inflation have left many people feeling squeezed, and dating can be very expensive. Americans spend nearly $700 on dates annually, with the average man spending the most — around $860, according to a 2020 report by LendingTree.
The average cost of a full dinner and a movie across major cities in the U.S. can cost around $159, according to a more recent analysis by MoneyGeek, conducted in 2023.

“That can be really hefty when we’re talking about an economy where people are struggling to pay their rent,” Blau said.
As a result, Blau saw the refund requests a little differently.
“Is it really that they had a bad intention [or] is it that they really couldn’t afford it?” she said.
What to do if it happens to you
Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images
If you receive a request from someone after your date, experts say there are pros and cons whether you ignore or pay it.
Ignoring the request sends the message that it was inappropriate, while paying it could be the fastest way to cut ties and never interact again, said Anderson.
Meanwhile, if you intend to request a refund from someone after a date, you may want to reconsider. It’s better to ask to split the bill from the beginning and make your boundaries clear, said Blau.
If getting the money back will help your finances or make you feel better about being rejected, “it’s your right to ask,” she said.
“It’s also their right to say no,” Blau added.
That’s basically what Costanza did. She ignored the request, and promptly blocked him.
“My time and energy is not refundable,” she said.
The world’s third-biggest company just saw its profits plummet 38%—but still paid shareholders $19.5 billion in dividends
Saudi Aramco, the third most valuable company in the world, saw its profits plummet 38% in the second quarter of the year as energy prices cooled.
Spiraling energy costs have squeezed household budgets over the past year while huge windfalls were recorded by oil and gas producers—including Aramco, which raked in a $161 billion profit in 2022, the highest ever recorded by an energy firm.
However on Monday the company—which is valued at more than $2.1 trillion, making Apple and Microsoft the only public companies in the world with higher valuations—reported that its net profit had fallen to 113 billion riyals ($30 billion) for the three months to June, a drop of almost 40% from a year earlier.
Aramco, which recently ranked No. 2 on the Fortune Global 500 list, cited lower crude oil prices and weaker margins in refining and chemicals as the drivers behind the decline.
Despite shrinking profits, Aramco said it would be paying a $19.5 billion dividend to shareholders for the second quarter—with the payout set to be delivered in the third quarter of the year. That was up from its $18.8 billion dividend payout for the second quarter of 2022.
Shareholders will also be receiving $19.5 billion in dividends for the first quarter of the year, the company added—meaning investors in the company would get a $39 billion payout for the first half of 2023, up from $37.5 billion a year earlier.
From the third quarter onward, Aramco said it would begin paying performance-based dividends, a move that will continue for six consecutive quarters and begin with a $9.87 billion payout.
The company labeled its dividend payouts “sustainable and progressive.”
“Our strong results reflect our resilience and ability to adapt through market cycles,” Aramco CEO Amin Nasser said on Monday. “We continue to demonstrate our long-standing ability to meet the needs of customers around the world with high levels of reliability. For our shareholders, we intend to start distributing our first performance-linked dividend in the third quarter.”
The Saudi state is Aramco’s biggest shareholder. The government directly owns more than 90% of the company, while the sovereign Public Investment Fund and its subsidiary Sanabil hold a further 8% of the firm’s shares, according to news agency Reuters.
Turbulent times
Aramco isn’t the only energy giant to have boosted dividends amid falling profits, with the Saudi powerhouse—the largest exporter of oil in the world—following in the footsteps of Shell and BP.
Much of the world, particularly Europe, was plunged into an energy crisis following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The ostracizing of Moscow, given its position as a major energy producer, shook already undersupplied energy markets thanks to economic sanctions that included a ban on imports of Russian oil.
Oil giants scored record profits last year in the wake of the energy crisis, but more recently have seen their revenues dented by cooling energy costs.
Brent crude oil prices edged slightly lower on Monday, trading at just below $85 a barrel by 9:30 a.m. EST.
Used as a benchmark for much of the oil traded around the globe, Brent has been staging a recovery in recent weeks after dipping below $72 a barrel—a far cry from mid-2022, when the price surpassed $100.
Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist for LPL Financial, told Fortune on Monday that Aramco wasn’t wrong to project a resilient market for oil going forward.
“The global economic backdrop, as central banks complete their respective rate hike campaigns, coupled with a softer dollar, is expected to provide a markedly more resilient underpinning for oil prices,” he said.
He added: “With tighter supplies, oil prices have begun a steady ascent with expectations that prices will end the year higher as momentum—and the global economy—continue to recover. Saudi Arabia, the de facto head of OPEC+, has signaled it will continue to adjust production in order to ‘stabilize’ prices, but it’s clear they want to propel prices toward $90 a barrel.”
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
More from Fortune:
5 side hustles where you may earn over $20,000 per year—all while working from home
Looking to make extra cash? This CD has a 5.15% APY right now
Buying a house? Here’s how much to save
This is how much money you need to earn annually to comfortably buy a $600,000 home
Get paid by the second as token streaming looks to disrupt global liquidity
Payments could soon be streamed in real-time rather than paid out on a monthly or weekly basis, according to Maxime Desalle, Operations Lead at Sablier, in a recent talk at EthCC.
Desalle discussed the concept of “token streaming” from the perspective of Sablier, a company aiming to provide more time-efficient and immediate access to funds.
As Desalle explained, token streaming involves sending small payments continuously, like streaming a movie or song. Instead of receiving a paycheck monthly, someone could get paid every second using Sablier’s platform. This reduces delays and latency in the economy, Desalle argues.
Desalle said,
“There is a lot of latency in our economy… Entities spending in our economy always wait for their income to arrive before they can start spending it. If there were streams for their income, they could spend it in real-time.”
He suggests Sablier’s streaming, along with competitors like Superfluid and LlamaPay, could solve freelancer issues, aligning incentives between clients and freelancers using “trustless payment mechanisms.” Currently, the ecosystem remains small currently, with significant room for growth in Sablier’s view.
According to Desalle, token streaming has potential use cases like payroll, investing, and airdrops. He highlighted Sablier’s new version, which enables custom streaming curves beyond just linear streaming and could allow exponential streams or traditional vesting schedules without manually configuring smart contracts. By representing streams as NFTs, Desalle proposed uses like borrowing against future income or selling the stream for instant access.
He envisioned a future of fully liquid economies, with balances changing every second from various streams facilitated by platforms like Sablier. Rent, subscriptions, and more could become real-time streaming payments between nodes.
While an intriguing concept, token streaming adoption likely faces hurdles such as volatility, taxation, and integration with legacy systems. However, the potential upside of instant liquidity for workers who currently live ‘paycheck-to-paycheck’ is evident. Furthermore, workers could make their money work for them in real-time by allowing wages to be instantly sent to savings even before the end of their shift.
Decentralized finance shows, once more, that it is disrupting traditional methodologies and systems with novel and innovative approaches that challenge the status quo bringing innovation and driving toward a fairer, more equitable world.
The post Get paid by the second as token streaming looks to disrupt global liquidity appeared first on CryptoSlate.
